Daily order sheet, C1, 03 Nov 2026 on 3 November 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Saurabh Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing. M.A. No.1278 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of 02 years 11 months and 20 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 1065 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

7. Ld. Counsel for the respondents raised objection regarding maintainability of this case before this Bench on the ground that the applicant is resident of State of Bihar but the applicant’s counsel submitted that the applicant was discharged from Prayagraj, his release medical board was held at Prayagraj.

8. Since last posting of the applicant was at Prayagraj, therefore, this Bench has territorial jurisdiction to entertain this case.

9. Case needs adjudication.

10. Admit.

11. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

12. List on 11.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 2)

OA No. 1086 of 2026 with MA No. 1301 of 2026

Ex Sgt Rakesh Kumar Rai

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Jainendra Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

3. As nobody is present to press this petition on behalf of the applicant, list this case for hearing on admission on 03.12.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 3)

Ex-A. No. 321 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 958 of 2024

Sgt Sudhir Jha (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri AK Choudhary, Advocate

Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 02.12.2025 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 958 of 2024.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

6. List on 13.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 4)

OA No. 918 of 2026 with MA No. 1099 of 2026

Ex Sub Major Santosh Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. There is delay of 11 months and 27 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents raised objection with regard to maintainability of this O.A before this Tribunal. He prays for and is granted four weeks time to seek instructions and to file objection, if any, on the maintainability of the O.A.

5. List on 01.02.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 5)

DY. No. 3197 of 2026

Sep Harvindra Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Nidhikant Dhyani, Advocate

Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

3. This is an defective application filed by the applicant. Registry has raised objection that there is delay of 05 years 02 months and 02 days in filing of this O.A but delay condonation application has not been filed.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submitted that inadvertently delay application was not filed. Now, the delay condonation application is also on record. Defect raised by the Registry is duly redressed. Registry is directed to allot regular O.A number to this case.

5. List this case for admission on 03.12.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 6)

DY. No. 3198 of 2026

Sep Satendra Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Nidhikant Dhyani, Advocate

Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri SN Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri SN Pandey, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri SN Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. This is an defective application filed by the applicant. Registry has raised objection that there is delay of 05 years 05 months and 02 days in filing of this O.A but delay condonation application has not been filed.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submitted that inadvertently delay application was not filed. Now, the delay condonation application is also on record. Defect raised by the Registry is duly redressed. Registry is directed to allot regular O.A number to this case.

5. List this case for admission on 03.12.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 51 of 2022 Inre: OA No. 108 of 2021 Ex Sep Bharat Chand

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. Compliance affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Earlier affidavit with regard to status of the case filed by respondents’ counsel is also taken on record.

3. By means of compliance affidavit, ld. Counsel for the respondents submitted that the order has been complied with. PPO has been issued on 18.08.2026 and payment has also been made to the applicant.

4. Perusal of the pension slip filed alongwith PPO reflects that payment has been made to the applicant. Grievance of the applicant is fully redressed.

5. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Sl. No.2)

Ex-A. No. 80 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 498 of 2021 Ex NK Liyakat Ansari

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the respondents and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In this case, the O.A was decided on 30.11.2021. Five years have already passed, writ petition which was filed by the respondents is also dismissed but the order has not been complied with.

5. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order and also file his personal affidavit.

6. List on 21.05.2027.

7. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

8. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 85 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 84 of 2022

Hav (MACP –II Hav Grade) Dinesh Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Compliance affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. By means of compliance affidavit, ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. PPO has been generated on 24.07.2026 and arrears alongwith interest has also been duly paid to the applicant on 18.08.2026.

4. Since the order has been complied with and grievance raised by the applicant is duly redressed, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 87 of 2023 Inre: OA No. OA No. 859 of 2021

Ex Nb Sub Jai Kumar Panicker

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In this case, the O.A was decided on 25.03.2022. About five years have already passed and writ petition filed by the respondents is duly dismissed on 29.04.2026, since then more than six months have passed but till today order has not been complied with.

5. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

6. It is made clear that if order is not complied with till the next date, exemplary cost shall be imposed on the respondents.

7. List on 25.05.2027.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

9. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 166 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 501 of 2022

Ex MWO Surendra Nath Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri MK Awasthi holding brief for Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that writ petition which is filed by the respondents against the order of this Bench, is duly dismissed on 24.09.2026 and now the compliance is under process. He prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

5. List on 25.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 200 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 631 of 2022

Ex Sub Umesh Singh Kushwaha

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey, Advocate

Shri RK Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Amrita Chakraborty, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri VP Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Ms. Amrita Chakraborty, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. PPO has been issued on 31.09.2026 and arrears alongwith interest has also been paid to the applicant.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant conceded the fact that order has been complied with.

4. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 230 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 553 of 2021 Ex Hav Jai Prakash Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Sunil Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that he has no instructions regarding the compliance of the order.

4. List on 26.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 270 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 614 of 2022

Ex POA (AH) Ramesh Chander

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ajit Kakkar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri MK Awasthi holding brief for Shri Ajit Kakkar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Affidavit of responsible officer with regard to the present status of the execution and cause of delay in implementation of the order, filed on behalf of the respondents, is taken on record.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that GSL has been sanctioned on 01.06.2026 and compliance is under process. He prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

6. List on 26.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 419 of 2023 Inre: OA No. TA No. 76 of 2022

MWO Yogendra Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Shri AK Chaudhary, Advocate

Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that writ petition which is filed by the respondents against the order of this Bench, is duly dismissed on 08.09.2026 and now the compliance is under process. He prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

5. It is made clear that if compliance is not done till the next date then coercive order shall be passed against the respondents.

6. Respondents are also directed to deposit all the cost pending against them.

7. Ld. Counsel for the applicant pointed out that in previous order dated 22.05.2026 the name of the applicant was inadvertently mentioned as Shailesh Kumar Ray in place of MWO Yogendra Singh.

8. List on 26.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. .10 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 104 of 2023

Col. Rakesh Chandra Jain (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : In Person

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the respondents and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that Writ Petition has already been filed assailing the order of this Tribunal before the Hon’ble High Court in which stay order has been passed which is still good and effective.

5. Since there is stay order in the matter, list this case on 26.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 41 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 509 of 2024

Lt. Col D Prakash Rao (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Compliance affidavit filed by the respondents is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with in letter and spirit. PPO has been issued on 20.04.2026 and payment has also been made to the applicant.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant conceded the fact that order has been complied with and no grievance is left.

5. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 42 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 58 of 2025

Ex Sub & Hony Lt Dinesh Mandal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri MK Awasthi holding brief for Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Affidavit of responsible officer with regard to the present status of the execution and cause of delay in implementation of the order, filed on behalf of the respondents, is taken on record.

3. By means of status report, it is submitted that this execution case is under consideration with Legal Cell at Headquarters for filing the writ petition but till date writ petition is not filed by the respondents. So respondents are directed to file compliance affidavit till the next date of listing otherwise coercive action shall be taken against the respondents.

4. List on 26.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 721 of 2024

Ex Sep/MT Awdhesh Kumar Chauhan

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri UKS Chauhan Advocate

Shri Ankur Rawat, Advocate

Shri Ravi Yadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is not present. Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present.

2. Rejoinder affidavit has not been filed by the applicant.

3. Last opportunity of four weeks is granted to the applicant to file rejoinder affidavit.

4. List on 13.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 852 of 2024

Hav (Chief Mess) Samsher Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Shri Anshuman Srivastava, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not available, however, Legal Representative is present and apprised the court that parawise comments already given to the learned counsel for the respondents on 29.03.2025.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Last opportunity of four weeks is given to the learned counsel for the respondents to file counter affidavit and if he fails to do so, then the opportunity shall be closed.

4. List on 13.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 997 of 2024

Sep Ravinder Kholiya (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Keshav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Last opportunity was granted to the applicant to file rejoinder affidavit which has not been filed by the applicant.

3. As prayed, one more last opportunity of four weeks is granted to the learned counsel for the applicant to file rejoinder affidavit.

4. List on 13.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 457 of 2025

Sub Jeewan Chandra (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri RD Singh , Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate holding brief of Shri RD Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents has filed counter affidavit which is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant may file rejoinder affidavit within four weeks.

4. List on 13.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 54 of 2026

Sub Sharma Anil Kumar Sheshmani (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Amit Asthana, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Narayan Dutt Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Amit Asthana, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents has filed counter affidavit which is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant may file rejoinder affidavit within four weeks.

4. List on 13.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 120 of 2026 Ex Cpl Vinod Singh Rathore

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Narayan Dutt Mishra, Advocate

Shri Amit Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Shri Madan Kumar Swarnkar, Advocate

Shri Ankit Negi, Advocate

Shri Naveen Gaur, Advocate

Shri Arun Nair, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Narayan Dutt Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. Shri Sunil Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present, however, Legal Representative is present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Legal Representative apprised the court that entire parawise comments have not been received. He seeks some more time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. Legal Representative is hereby directed to call original record pertaining to this case for perusal of the Bench on the next date fixed and also file counter affidavit till next date of listing.

6. List on 14.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 409 of 2026

JWO Shiv Nath Choudhary (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Shri Ram Jivan Dixit, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the applicant which is taken on record. Registry is directed to show his name also as counsel for the applicant in future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that counter affidavit is ready and he will file the same in the Registry during the course of day.

4. Copy of counter affidavit is duly received by the learned counsel for the applicant who may file rejoinder affidavit within four weeks.

5. List on 14.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 410 of 2026 with MA No. 494 of 2026

Smt Savitri Devi W/o Late Sep Santosh Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Amit Pandey, Advocate

Shri Pramod Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Pramod Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Time was granted to the respondents to file objection on delay condonation application which has not been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks some more time to file objection. As prayed, four weeks further time is allowed to file objection on delay condonation application.

4. List on 14.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 413 of 2026

Sub Narender Kumar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate holding brief of Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments not received and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 14.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1424 of 2023

Sqn Ldr Subodh Dixit

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri SN Dwivedi, Advocate

Shri RP Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri SN Dwivedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court physically but Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present physically, however, he is present virtually.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant put his arguments.

3. List this case for physical hearing on 07.12.2026 for remaining arguments.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 451 of 2024

Ex Sub Jitendra Nath Tiwari

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Advocate

Shri Abhishek Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks some more time to file legible copies of Page No. 12, 13 & 14 of the counter affidavit.

3. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to file legible copies of Page No. 12, 13 & 14 of the counter affidavit.

4. List for physical hearing on 22.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 452 of 2024

Ex Gnr Mohammad Khalid

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Rajesh Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present physically, however he is present through virtual mode.

2. This is physical final hearing matter and therefore, physical presence of both the parties is necessary.

3. If learned counsel for the respondents is not present physically on the next date fixed, then case shall be heard and decided on the basis of arguments made by the learned counsel for the applicant.

4. List for physical hearing on 22.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 571 of 2024 Ex LOG I (STD) Mahesh Singh Dobhal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey, Advocate

Shri RK Singh, Advocate

Shri Deepak Bhatt, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri VP Pandey and Shri RK Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present physically. Shri Sunil Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present physically, however, he is present virtually. Legal Representative is present.

2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Judgment reserved.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1117 of 2024

Ex Sub Maj Jodhpal Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Singh, Advocate

Shri Ankur Rawat, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ashok Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Judgment reserved.

SB