Daily order sheet, C1, 02 Nov 2026 on 2 November 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This original application has been filed for grant of premature discharge to the applicant.

5. Case needs adjudication.

6. Admit.

7. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

8. List on 11.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 3)

OA No. 1059 of 2026

Ex Rect Pushpendra Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Parijaat Belaura, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents raised objection with regard to maintainability of this O.A before this Tribunal on the ground that without availing any alternate remedy, the applicant approached this Bench and submitted that he shall file objection in this regard.

5. Respondents’ counsel prays for and is granted four weeks time to seek instructions and to file objection, if any, on the maintainability of the O.A.

6. List on 11.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 4)

OA No. 1060 of 2026 with MA No. 1269 of 2026

Ex Rect Asst Raj Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate Shri Surendra Kumar, Advocate Shri Yashpal SinghYadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Namit Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Namit Sharma, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Departmental Representative for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of more than 18 years in filing this original application as reported by the Registry. Applicant has filed delay condonation application for condoning the delay.

5. Departmental Representative raised objection with regard to delay in filing of this O.A. She prays for and is granted four weeks time to seek instructions and to file objection, if any, to the delay condonation application.

6. List on 11.05.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 5)

OA No. 1061 of 2026

Ex Nk Rohit Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Anurag Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Anurag Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ashok Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri Anurag Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

5. Case needs adjudication.

6. Admit.

7. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

8. List on 11.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 6) OA No. 1062 of 2026 with MA No. 1275 of 2026

Ex Sgt Vinod Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate Shri Surendra Kumar, Advocate Shri Yashpal SinghYadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present. M.A. No. 1275 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is no delay in filing of Original Application. However, Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application which is rejected as not required.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 1062 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. In this case, Entitlement rules and GMO 2023 has also been challenged.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 11.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 7) OA No. 1063 of 2026 with MA No. 1276 of 2026

Ex Sgt Harsh Kumar Gondi

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate Shri Surendra Kumar, Advocate Shri Yashpal SinghYadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ram Sharan Awasthi, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Ram Sharan Awasthi, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ram Sharan Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present. M.A. No. 1276 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is no delay in filing of Original Application. However, Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application which is rejected as not required.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 1063 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. In this case, Entitlement rules and GMO 2023 has also been challenged.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 11.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 8)

TA No. 37 of 2026

JWO Ratan Sutradhar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant :

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Rahul Pal, Shri Dheeraj Kumar and Shri Tatsat Shukla on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. Registry is directed to show their names as counsel for the applicant in the future cause list.

3. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh holding brief for Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

4. This application has been received by transfer from Principal Bench, New Delhi. Copy of TA alongwith counter affidavit is duly received by Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents.

5. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that he is not inclined to file rejoinder affidavit and requested to post this case for final hearing.

6. As prayed by applicant’s counsel, list this case for final hearing on 22.02.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 9)

MA No. 1181 of 2026 Inre: TA No. 32 of 2025

NK/DSC GD Shailendra Kumar Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. This early hearing application has been filed by the applicant. Next date of hearing in this case fixed is 11.02.2027.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that this matter pertains to reinstatement of the applicant and disability pension in second service. Applicant is already discharged, so there is no urgency in the case. Put up this T.A on the date already fixed.

4. M.A No. 1181 of 2026 stands disposed of.

5. List on 11.02.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 316 of 2023 with MA No. 929 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 530 of 2022 Ex Cfn Surya Bhan Giri

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate Shri Sandeep Tripathi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vinay Pandey and Shri Sandeep Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant are present before the Court. Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 is present through video conferencing while Mohd. Zafar Khan, Ld. Counsel for R- 6 and 7 is present before the Court.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that as per order of this Bench, compliance has been done in letter and spirit and no grievance is left.

3. Perusal of the records reveals that applicant was already receiving 30% disability pension for life and the benefit of rounding off of disability element from 30% for life to 50% for life from 01.01.1996 was granted vide judgement dated 16.12.2022 as the applicant was pre-1996 retiree. The direction contained in the judgement has been complied with.

4. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Sl. No.2)

Ex-A. NO. 381 of 2023 Inre: OA. 521 of 2022 Ex Nk Chakradhar Majhi

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Kavita Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Ms. Kavita Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that in compliance of the order dated 12.01.2023, GSL has been issued on 13.08.2026 and compliance is under process. She seeks some more time to file compliance affidavit. Time as prayed is allowed.

3. List on 25.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. NO. 443 of 2023 Inre: OA. 751 of 2022

Ex Sgt Gyanendu Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Kavita Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Ms. Kavita Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that in compliance of the order dated 18.05.2026, undertaking is not filed by the applicant.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant is directed to file undertaking as per earlier direction to expedite the case for compliance.

4. List on 25.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 57 of 2024 Inre: OA. No. 210 of 2023

Ex Sgt Manoj Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that in compliance of the order dated 18.05.2026, undertaking is not filed by the applicant. If the undertaking is filed, it is supposed that respondents shall comply the order.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant is directed to file undertaking as per earlier direction to expedite the case for compliance.

4. In this case, cost of Rs. 20,000/- has already been deposited by the respondents which shall be remitted to the applicant.

5. List on 25.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 98 of 2024 Inre: OA. No 225 of 2023

Ex Sub Ash Mohammad Khan

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri UC Bajpai holding brief for Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court. Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present today. Departmental Representative is present for the respondents.

2. Heard the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that in pursuance of order dated 14.01.2026, applicant has already filed his undertaking on 07.04.2026.

5. Applicant has provided his undertaking on 07.04.2026 and after that case was fixed on 18.05.2026 and now today also compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents. In this case, the O.A was decided on 01.06.2023. Three years have already passed but order has been complied with.

6. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

7. List on 25.05.2027.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

9. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 275 of 2024 with MA No. 936 of 2026 Inre: OA. No. 172 of 2023

Ex Hav Anil Kumar Awasthi

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. PPO has been issued on 26.05.2026 and payment alongwith interest has also been made to the applicant.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant conceded the fact that order has been complied with.

4. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 103 of 2025 Inre: OA. No. 685 of 2023 Ex JWO Raj Karan Pal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant :Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate

Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the respondents and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents stated that in pursuance of the order of this Bench respondents have already received the undertaking of the applicant and compliance is under process.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

6. List on 25.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 104 of 2025 Inre: TA. No. 12 of 2024

MWO Kundan Kumar Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Amit Asthana, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. PPO has been issued on 14.10.2026 and payment has also been made to the applicant alongwith interest. Copy of PPO filed by the respondents is taken on record.

3. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 289 of 2025 Inre: OA. No. 130 of 2024

Ex Hav Sushil Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KP Datta, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KP Datta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that he has no instructions in the matter.

5. In this case, the O.A was decided on 28.02.2025. Last opportunity has already been given and cost of Rs. 10000/- was also imposed against the respondents. About two years have already passed, neither any writ petition has been filed by the respondents nor order has been complied with.

6. In these circumstances, there is no other option except to comply the order of this Bench. It is directed that Sr. Record Officer, EME Records shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

7. Respondents are also directed to deposit all the cost due against them by the next date of listing.

8. List on 25.05.2027.

9. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

10. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of Sr. Record Officer, EME Records.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 290 of 2025 Inre: OA. No.1344 of 2023

MWO (HFL) Mahender Singh Sihag (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that in pursuance of the order dated 18.05.2026, applicant has filed his undertaking to the respondents.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents stated that compliance is under process. He prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

6. List on 26.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 291 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 584 of 2023

Sgt Birendra Kumar Patel (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Deepti Prasad Bajpai, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court. Ms. Deepti Prasad Bajpai, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present today. Departmental Representative is present through video conferencing for the respondents.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the applicant and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that in pursuance of the order of this Bench, applicant has filed his undertaking on 24.10.2026 to the respondents.

5. Departmental Representative stated that compliance is under process. He prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

6. List on 26.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 292 of 2025 Inre: OA. No. 817 of 2023

Ex Nb Sub Jay Ram Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Status report filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. By means of status report, it is submitted that being aggrieved by the order of this Bench, respondents are going to file writ petition before the Hon’ble High Court but till date neither any writ petition has been filed by the respondents nor order has been complied with. There is no any operative stay order in the case.

4. In these circumstances, there is no other option, Record Officer, Arty. Records shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

5. List on 26.05.2027.

6. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

7. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of Record Officer, Arty. Records.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 75 of 2024 with MA No. 89 of 2024

Hony. Sub Maj Diwan Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KKS Bisht, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri KKS Bisht, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present. Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present, however Legal Representative is present.

2. Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh holding brief of learned counsel for the applicant prays for adjournment of the case.

3. As prayed, the case is adjourned for the day.

4. List on 12.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 364 of 2024 with Dy. No. 3465 of 2025 with MA No. 442 of 2024

Prem Sundri W/o Late Ex Sep Ram Khilawan and Others Applicants By Legal Practitioner for the Applicants : Shri Dharam Raj Singh, Advocate

Shri Shyam Sunder Bajpai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none appeared on behalf of the applicants. Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present.

2. Counter affidavit and supplementary counter affidavit already filed by the learned counsel for the respondents is taken on record.

3. Delay condonation application shall be heard and decided at the time of final disposal of the case.

4. List on 12.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 379 of 2026

Nk Chandure Sunil Dilip

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rang Nath Pandey, Advocate Shri Rahul Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks some more time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 14.01.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 380 of 2026 with MA No. 747 of 2026

Nk Anurag Pandey

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rang Nath Pandey, Advocate Shri Rahul Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Amendment application moved on behalf of the applicant is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks time to file objection on amendment application.

4. As prayed, four weeks time is granted to the respondents to file objection on amendment application.

5. List on 12.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 406 of 2026

Sub Brij Mohan Sharma (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Amit Asthana, Advocate

Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Anurag Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Shri Anurag Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments have been received and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 12.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 407 of 2026 Ex Nk Kuldeep Kumar Singh Lalbahadur Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Shri Umesh Chandra Bajpai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Umesh Chandra Bajpai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents has filed counter affidavit which is taken on record.

3. Copy of counter affidavit has been duly received by the learned counsel for the applicant who seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file rejoinder affidavit.

4. List on 12.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 408 of 2026

Nk Rakesh Kumar Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rang Nath Pandey, Advocate

Shri Rahul Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments have been received and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 14.01.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 769 of 2026 with MA No. 927 of 2026 Hony Nb Sub Arvind Pal (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode. M.A. No. 927 of 2026

2. There is delay of 01 year, 07 months and 11 days in filing Original Application. Delay condonation application has been filed by the applicant.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that delay caused in filing of Original Application is not deliberate, but on account of reasons given in affidavit filed in support of application.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

5. We are of the view that ground shown in affidavit filed in support of application is sufficient. Delay condonation application is allowed and delay in filing application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands disposed of. O.A. No. 769 of 2026

6. This Original Application has been filed for grant of disability element.

7. Matter needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Learned counsel for the respondents is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 12.05.2027.

11. Shri Gyan Singh submitted that in this case he is counsel but name of Shri Shyam Singh is shown as counsel for the respondents in the cause list. Registry is directed to show name of Shri Gyan Singh in place of Shri Shyam Singh as counsel for the respondents in future cause list.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 774 of 2026 with MA No. 937 of 2026 Sgt Ashwani Kumar Gupta (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Advocate

Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Akshay Tiwari, Advocate Ms. Tanya Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present, however Legal Representative is present. M.A. No. 937 of 2026

3. There is delay of 04 months and 19 days in filing Original Application. Delay condonation application has been filed by the applicant.

4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that delay caused in filing of Original Application is not deliberate, but on account of reasons given in affidavit filed in support of application.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6. We are of the view that ground shown in affidavit filed in support of application is sufficient. Delay condonation application is allowed and delay in filing application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands disposed of. O.A. No. 774 of 2026

7. This Original Application has been filed for grant of disability element under GMO 2023.

8. Matter needs adjudication.

9. Admit.

10. Learned counsel for the respondents is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

11. List on 12.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1072 of 2026

Ris (Clk /SD) Mohan Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Advocate

Shri Abhishek Singh, Advocate Gunjan Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. This Original Application has been filed for grant of honorary commission.

3. Matter needs adjudication.

4. Admit.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

6. List on 13.01.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1317 of 2023

Ex Sub Japan Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Namit Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Shri Namit Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Legal Representative apprised the court that original record pertaining to this case is available to her.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents/Legal Representative is directed to retain the original record and produce before the Bench on next date of listing for perusal of the court.

4. It is directed that if learned counsel for the applicant fails to appear on the next date fixed, then case shall be heard and decided as per available record.

5. List for hearing on 17.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 269 of 2023

Ex Sub Birendra Pratap Tripathi

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Shri Amit Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant alongwith applicant is present before the court. Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents Nos. 1 to 4 is present through virtual mode. Shri Amit Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents Nos. 5&6 is present before the court.

2. Today, this case was fixed for filing of counter affidavit on behalf of respondents No. 5 & 6 (Bank) but the same has not been filed.

3. It is directed that if on the next date fixed, counter affidavit is not received on behalf of respondent No. 5 & 6, then adverse inference shall be drawn against the responsible officer/official of the Bank.

4. Copy of counter affidavit being filed by the respondent No. 5 & 6, to be provided to learned counsel for the applicant who may file rejoinder affidavit.

5. List for hearing on 21.12.2026.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 897 of 2023 Ex Sub Mohan Singh Bisht

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Gopal Singh Bhakuni, Advocate

Shri KKS Bisht, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is not present. Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is also not present, however, Legal Representative is present.

2. An adjournment is prayed on behalf of the learned counsel for the applicant.

3. As prayed, the case is adjourned for the day.

4. List for hearing on 18.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1308 of 2023 with MA No. 1873 of 2023

Ex Hav Harisudan Thapa

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh, Advocate

Shri Rahul Dev Tripathi, Advocate Shri Raghuveer Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Ms. Pallavi Borhogain, Advocate holding brief of Shri Virat Anand Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present. Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present, however, Legal Representative is present.

2. Brief holder to learned counsel for the applicant prays for adjournment of the case.

3. As prayed, the case is adjourned for the day.

4. List for hearing on 19.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1017 of 2022

Prahlad Ram Meena

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. As prayed by learned counsel for the applicant, four weeks further time is granted to file rejoinder affidavit.

3. List for order on 11.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 445 of 2024

AC (U/T) Saurabh Rai

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh, Advocate Shri Narendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Siddharth Dayal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Ms. Pallavi Borhogain, Advocate holding brief of Shri Virat Anand Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present. Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Brief holder to learned counsel for the applicant prays for adjournment of the case.

3. As prayed, the case is adjourned for the day.

4. List for hearing on 19.02.2027.

SB