Daily order sheet, C2, 02 Nov 2026 on 2 November 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri KP Datta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are physically present. M.A. No. 1299 of 2026

3. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing Original Application. The delay condonation is supported with affidavit. There is delay of 02 years, 10 months and 25 days in filing Original Application.

4. Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that delay in filing of Original Application is not deliberate, but on account of reasons stated in affidavit filed in support of application.

5. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that cause shown for the delay is not sufficient.

6. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we find that cause shown is sufficient.

8. Accordingly, delay in filing Original Application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 1084 of 2026.

9. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was invalidated out from service in the year 1990 but the recovery has started from his pension on the authority of letter dated 07.04.2022, which is not permissible.

10. Matter pertains to review of ACR of the applicant for the Year 2023 for promotion to the rank of Sub Maj which needs adjudication.

11. Admit.

12. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file Counter Affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

13. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 3)

O.A. No. 1096 of 2026 with M.A. No. 1311 of 2026 Sep (MACP Hav) Upendra Dubey (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KP Datta, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There has been delay for more than 18 years, 04 months and 09 days in filing this Original Application. Delay Condonation Application has been filed by the applicant. Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four weeks time to file Objection against delay condonation application as well as maintainability of the original application.

5. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 4)

O.A.(A). No. 1091 of 2026 with M.A. No. 1304 of 2026

Ex Hav (SKT) Devendra Singh Pal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma and Shri Rahul Pal,

Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Namit Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Namit Sharma, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Keshav Sharma and Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant are physically present and Shri Namit Sharma, Ld. counsel for the respondents is virtually present.

3. Matter pertains to District Court Martial (DCM) which requires consideration.

4. Admit.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and allowed four weeks time to file Counter Affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed by the applicant within two weeks, thereafter.

6. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 5)

EX. A. No. 3326 of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 197 of 2024

Nk Ram Pratap DSC(Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are physically present.

3. This fresh Execution Application has been filed by the applicant for non- implementation of order dated 06.05.2026 passed by this Tribunal in O.A. No. 197 of 2024.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents directed to seek instructions and to file compliance affidavit by next date fixed.

5. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sup No. 6)

M.A. No. 1307 of 2026 with M.A. No. 1308 of 2026 Inre Dy No. 2494 of 2025

Smt Anwara Bibi w/o late Sep Ishaq Khan

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinod Kumar, Advocate Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List revised.

2. Memo of appearance filed by Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name shall be shown in the cause list when the case is listed next.

3. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Sunil Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present. None appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this recall application even after pass over of the case.

4. In view of the above, the case is dismissed due to non-prosecution.

rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No.2/1)

O.A. No. 536 of 2026

Ex Hav Ramesh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Ashok Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submitted that, today, record is not available with him. However, he wishes to file objection against maintainability of the original application by next date fixed.

4. Member (A) Member (J) Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A/438 of 2023 Inre O.A. No. 22 of 2022

Sub (PA) Digar Singh Bisht

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List revised.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present in Court.

3. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. Compliance affidavit has not been filed on behalf of the respondents even after dismissal of writ petition on 24.03.2026 which was filed against order of this Tribunal.

5. On earlier occasion (21.07.2026), despite issuing clear instructions for appearance of Col PS-3, the concerned officer is not virtually present to explain the reasons for delay in implementation of order of this Tribunal. This being very sorry state of affairs, cost of Rs 10,000/- is imposed.

6. In view of the above, on next date of listing ADG PS shall remain present through virtual mode to explain the reasons for delay in implementation of order of this Tribunal.

7. Respondents are directed to deposit all the cost due against them till next date of listing.

8.

9. Copy of this order shall be provided to OIC Legal Cell for compliance.

rathore

ORDER SHEET

EX-A. No. 332 of 2025 Inre O.A. No. 1052 of 2023

Ranjana Pandey W/o Late Spr Akhilesh Kumar Pandey Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Narayan Dutt Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Umesh Chandra Sharma, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Narayan Dutt Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are physically present.

2. On 28.07.22026, last opportunity was granted to the respondents to file compliance affidavit failing which Cost of Rs. 25000/- to be paid to the applicant.

3. Three and half years have already been passed. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that he has no instruction regarding compliance of the Tribunal order.

4. Due to unnecessary delay on the part of the respondents, cost Rs. 25000/- was imposed but the same has not yet been deposited by the respondents. In this matter till today neither any Writ is filed by the respondents nor any S.L.P. So in this circumstances there is no other option except to call the responsible officer. Consequently, OIC Records, Bengal Engineer Group shall appear before the Tribunal, virtually, on next date of hearing to explain the reason as to why the order of this Tribunal dated 27.03.2025 passed in O.A. No. 1052 of 2023 has not yet been complied with and in the meantime, if the order of the Tribunal complied with then there is no need to appear, virtually, on next date of listing.

5. Copy of this order be provided to the Respondents/Legal Cell for compliance.

6. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET

EX-A. No. 201 of 2026 with M.A. No. 1151 of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 694 of 2022

Ex L/Nk (SHGD) Krishna Bihari Mishra

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Col RA Pandey (Retd.) and Shri Arun Kumar,

Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Arun Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are physically present. M.A. No. 1151 of 2026

2. The applicant has moved this substitution application with prayer that during pendency of the execution application of the O.A. Shri Krishna Bihari Mishra, the applicant, report to be no more and his survival Smt. Usha Devi who is the legally wedded wife of the applicant will be substituted in place of Shri Krishna Bihari Mishra.

3. Since respondents have no objection, therefore this substitution application is allowed. Aforesaid M.A. No. is disposed of.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant is directed to incorporate the necessary amendment in the O.A. substituting the name of Smt. Usha Devi as applicant in place of Late Shri Krishna Bihari Mishra within fifteen days.

5. Respondents are also directed to file compliance affidavit by next date fixed.

6. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET

M.A. No. 939 of 2026 with M.A. No. 940 of 2026 Inre M.A. No. 1253 of 2025, Inre Ex-A. No. 134 of 2018 Inre O.A. No. 123 of 2010

Smt Durgawati Singh

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat anand Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, none present for the applicant and Shri GS Sikarwar, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 5)

O.A. No. 239 of 2023

Nb Sub Vijay Pal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri K.P. Datta brief holder for Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Counter Affidavit has already been filed by the learned counsel for applicant, which is taken on record. Time is granted to the learned counsel for applicant to file Rejoinder Reply within 02 weeks.

3. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 6)

O.A. No. 432 of 2024

Ex Capt Gopal Chandra Agarwal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri K.P. Datta brief holder for Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant before the court and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents is also present before the court.

2. Last opportunity is granted to the ld. Counsel for applicant to file Rejoinder reply.

3. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 7)

O.A. No. 118 of 2025 with M.A. No. 139 of 2025

Nk Babu Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Ms. Deepti P Bajpai, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Keshav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. None present for the respondents either physically or virtually.

2. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that reply to the objection filed by ld. Counsel for respondents is ready and the same shall be filed during the course of day.

3. HLS/-

Form No. 4 See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 283 of 2025

Ex (Spr/Cook) Ajay Kumar Tiwari

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Namit Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri K.P. Datta brief holder for Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Namit Sharma, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for applicant seeks time to file Rejoinder reply. Time as prayed is allowed. He is directed to file R.A. within 2 weeks.

3. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 9)

O.A. No. 702 of 2025 with M.A. No. 828 of 2025

Ramesh Kumar Pal s/o Ex Hav Ram Nath

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, none present for the applicant. Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Today, none present for the applicant either physically or through video conferencing. On the last occasion also, i.e. on 24.12.2026, no body was present on behalf of the applicant. It appears that applicant is no more interested to pursue this case. Accordingly, O.A. is dismissed in default and for non- prosecution.

3. No order as to costs.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 10)

O.A. No. 715 of 2025

Hav (Clk SD)Devendra Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Col AK Srivastava(Retd) and Shri Amarendu

Srivastava, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Col A.K. Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents filed objection to the delay condonation applicant and submitted that delay has not been properly explained by the ld. Counsel for applicant and applicant has slept over his right for more than 8 years and he has requested to dismiss the O.A. on the ground of delay.

4. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that there is no delay because this O.A. has been filed within 6 months from his retirement. Accordingly, delay is condoned.

5. The matter pertains to promotion, needs adjudication.

6. Ld. Counsel for respondents is directed to file Counter Affidavit within 04 weeks. Rejoinder Reply may be filed within 02 weeks thereafter.

7. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 11)

O.A. No. 882 of 2025 with M.A. No. 1047 of 2025 and M.A. No. 1048 of 2025

Smt Ram Dulari W/o Late Nk Ram Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Shri Raj Kumar

Mishra and Shri Narendra Kumar Shukla,

Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, none present for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court. However, Sri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate is present through video conferencing and Sri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Advocate is present before the court.

2. As per order dated 9th July, 2026, it was directed by this bench that the name of Raj Kumar Mishra and Sri Chandan Kumar Pandey has wrongly been mentioned in the cause list. Today name of both the counsel again wrongly mentioned in the cause list, whereas both the above advocates are not counsel in this O.A. Hence, registry is directed not to print the name of both the counsel in future cause list.

3. Today, Sri Narandra Kumar Shukla, ld. Counsel for applicant is not present . On the earlier occasion also, no one was present on behalf of the applicant. Meaning thereby, applicant has lost interest to pursue his case. Accordingly, O.A. is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.

4. No order as to costs.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A No. 743 of 2026 with M.A. No. 893 of 2026

Ex Nb Sub Jamwant Verma

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi and Shri Anshuman

Srivastava, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Umesh Chandra Bajpai brief holder for Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri GS Sikarwar, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents has already filed objection to the delay condonation application which is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that reply to the objection of delay condonation application is ready and the same shall be filed in the registry during the course of day.

4. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 775 of 2026 with M.A. No. 938 of 2026

Smt Hanshi Devi w/o Nk Late Jai Datt (Retd)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Ms. Upasna

Mishra, Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Shri Pradeep

Kumar Mishra, Ms. Tanya Singh and Shri

Rama Singh, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. Objection against delay condonation application has already been filed by ld. Counsel for respondents, which is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that applicant is the legally wedded wife of the Nk (late) Jai Datt 13938042 M and she could not approach this Tribunal earlier for grant of 2nd family pension being an aged widow and residing in a remote area and further submitted that the matter pertains to 2nd Service Pension and also submitted that considering the pension matter, delay has no means. However, respondents have objected the same.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances, delay is condoned. M.A. No. 938/2026 stands disposed off.

4. Matter pertains to pension, needs adjudication.

5. Ld. Counsel for respondents is directed to file counter affidavit within 04 weeks. Rejoinder Reply may be filed within 02 weeks thereafter.

6. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 1010 of 2023

Ex Nk Baboo Ram

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Arguments concluded.

4. Order reserved.

rathore

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 1377 of 2023

Ex Hav Hari Bahadur KC

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant :Shri Prakhar Kankan and Shri KKS Bisht, Advocates Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Prakhar Kankan, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Matter requires physical hearing but both the counsels are virtually present.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant seeks adjournment.

4. As prayed, list on 20.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

rathore

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 701 of 2025

Smt Maheshi Devi Widow of Nb Sub Dhan Singh

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Prakhar Kankan and Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocates Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RKS Chauhan, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri RKS Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Matter requires physical hearing but both the counsels are virtually present.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant seeks adjournment.

4. As prayed, list on 27.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

rathore

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 816 of 2025

Ex Sub (Musn) Prakash Singh Negi

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Wg Cdr SN Dwivedi (Retd), Advocate Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms Appoli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Wg Cdr SN Dwivedi (Retd), Ld. Counsel for the applicant is physically present. Ms Appoli Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and allowed time to bring on record some documents by means of supplementary counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, list on 06.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

rathore

ORDER SHEET

O.A. (A) No. 1228 of 2024

Ex Sep/MT Amit Kumar Giri (Through Raj Kumar Giri, Pairokar)

Appellant

By Legal Practitioner for the Appellant : Col Ashok Kumar (Retd) and Shri Rohit Kumar, Advocates Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Rohit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the appellant is present through virtual mode and Shri Sunil Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present in Court.

2. Ld. Counsel for the appellant seeks adjournment.

3. As prayed, list on 12.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

4. On next date fixed, the respondents shall produce original record pertaining to this case for perusal of ther bench.

rathore