Madras High Court

CRL OP/5220/2026 of Vinoth Kumar Vs State Rep by on 12 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRL OP No. 5220 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12-11-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.RAMESH

CRL OP No. 5220 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA010339372026}

Vinoth Kumar

S/o.Chinnathambi,

Admin Executive, Agni Group of Companies, No.76, North Mada Street, Mylapore, Chennai - 600004.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. State Rep by

The Inspector of Police,

E-1, Mylapore Police Station,

Chennai - 600004.

2. Mageswari

W/o.Dilip,

Renugambal Kovil Street,

Cross Street, Perambur,

Chennai - 600 011.

..Respondent(s)

Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition filed under section 528 of BNSS, praying to cancel the bail granted by the Principal Sessions Court, Chennai in Crl.MP.No.22714 of 2024 dated 14.08.2024 in Crime No.123 of 2024 and pass such other suitable orders that this Honble Court may deem fit and thus render justice.

For Petitioner(s):

M/s. S.S.Sukanya for Ashwinkumar A.

for AMS Legal

For Respondent(s):

Mr.R.Rajasekaran,

Government Advocate (Crl.Side) FOR R1

Not ready For R2

( Uploaded on: 13/11/2026 08:20:19 pm )

CRL OP No. 5220 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking cancellation of the bail granted to the second respondent by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai, vide order dated 14.08.2024 in Crl.M.P. No. 22714 of 2024 in Crime No. 123 of 2024.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the first respondent.

3. By order dated 14.08.2024 in Crl.M.P. No. 22714 of 2024 in Crime No. 123 of 2024, the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai, granted bail to the second respondent herein subject to certain conditions. The relevant portion of the said order reads as follows:

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai and on further condition that (a) the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left

( Uploaded on: 13/11/2026 08:20:19 pm )

CRL OP No. 5220 of 2026

Thumb impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar Card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity.

(b) the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders.

(c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

(d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(e) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the above petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the above petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K. Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560].

(f) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.”

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, after obtaining bail, the second respondent failed to comply with the bail conditions and did not

( Uploaded on: 13/11/2026 08:20:19 pm )

CRL OP No. 5220 of 2026

appear before the first respondent police. Hence, the present petition has been filed seeking cancellation of the bail granted to her.

5. Despite several attempts, notice could not be served on the second respondent. A direction was also issued to the first respondent police to serve notice on her. However, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions, submitted that the police could not trace her and that her whereabouts are not known.

6. Considering the above circumstances, particularly the failure of the second respondent to comply with the bail conditions and the fact that notice could not be served on her due to her abscondence, this Court is inclined to cancel the bail granted to her. Accordingly, the bail granted to the second respondent by order dated 14.08.2024 in Crl.M.P. No. 22714 of 2024 in Crime No. 123 of 2024, by the Principal Sessions Court, Chennai, is hereby cancelled.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. 12-11-2026 MPA

( Uploaded on: 13/11/2026 08:20:19 pm )

CRL OP No. 5220 of 2026

To

1. The Inspector of Police, E-1, Mylapore Police Station, Chennai - 600004.

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

( Uploaded on: 13/11/2026 08:20:19 pm )

CRL OP No. 5220 of 2026

N.RAMESH, J. MPA CRL OP No. 5220 of 2026 12-11-2026

( Uploaded on: 13/11/2026 08:20:19 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead