Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/25884/2026 of Balamurugan Vs The District Superintendent of Police on 12 November 2026
CRL OP(MD) No. 25884 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 12-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
CRL OP(MD) No. 25884 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011549042026}
Balamurugan
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The District Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District-630 562.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police
Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manamadurai-630 606.
3. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep ByThe Inspector Of Police, Manamadurai Town Police Station, Sivagangai District-630 606.
(In Crime No.454/2026)
4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police
Crime Branch Crime Investigation Department, Madurai-625 002.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: This Petition filed under section Petition u/s 528 of BNSS to transfer the Investigation in Crime No.454 of 2026, dated 11.09.2026, from the file of 3rd Respondent to the 4th respondent for conduct fair and impartial investigation in accordance with law and consequently direct to file same investigation For Petitioner(s)
:M/s R.SENTHILKUMAR
For Respondent(s)
:MR.ARUN,
GOVT.ADVOCATE(CRL.SIDE)
CRL OP(MD) No. 25884 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The present petition has been filed by the sole accused in Cr.No.454 of 2026 on the file of the 4th respondent police, seeking a direction to transfer the said investigation to the 4th respondent.
2. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner herein, his vehicle was not at all involved in the accident and it is a self fault by the deceased from his two-wheeler. His vehicle has been wrongly implicated for the purpose of getting compensation from the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. Despite having a CCTV footage about the non-involvement of his vehicle, the false case has been foisted as against the petitioner and his vehicle.
3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents police submitted that they are eyewitnesses to the said accident and they have also recovered the CCTV footages.
4. Considering the grievance expressed by the petitioner herein, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to monitor the investigation, and after getting permission from the second respondent a
CRL OP(MD) No. 25884 of 2026 final report shall be filed before the jurisdictional Court, by the third respondent.
5. With the aforesaid observations, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. 12-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PNM To
1. The District Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent of Police Sivagangai District-630 562
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police Manamadurai-630 606
3. Inspector Of Police, Manamadurai Town Police Station Sivagangai District-630 606
4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Crime Branch Crime Investigation Department Madurai-625 002
5. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai
CRL OP(MD) No. 25884 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. PNM CRL OP(MD) No. 25884 of 2026 12-11-2026