Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/25531/2026 of Paradesi Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Pettai on 11 November 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 11-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
CRL.O.P.(MD) No.25531 of 2026
and
CRL.M.P.(MD) No.23708 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011575932026}
1. Paradesi
2. Esakkiraja
3. Thavasimahi
4. Esakkimuthu
5. Iyyamperumal
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Pettai, Pettai Police Station, Tiruneiveli District. (Crime No. 342 of 2026).
2. Mariappan
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER:
This Petition filed under section Petition u/s 528 of BNSS, to call for records in FIR in Crime No. 342 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of police, Pettai police station quash the same and to pass such further or any circumstances of the case and thus render justice.
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr.S.Kasirajan
For Respondent(s)
: Mr.B.Arun
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
for R1
Ms.T.Mayakrishnan for R2
__________
( Uploaded on: 13/11/2026 05:00:53 pm )
CRL OP(MD) No. 25531 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The present petition has been filed by A1 to A5 in Crime No.342 of 2026, on the file of the first respondent police seeking to quash the FIR, wherein they are charged with the offences under Sections 189(2), 296(b), 115(2) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
2. Pending investigation, the parties have entered into a compromise wherein the defacto complainant had agreed for quashing of the FIR.
3. Today, the defacto complainant is present in-person and he acknowledges the fact that he had agreed for quashing of the FIR.
4. Considering the above said facts, the FIR in Crime No.342 of 2026, on the file of the first respondent police is hereby quashed.
5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Index: Yes/No 11-11-2026 Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No drm __________
( Uploaded on: 13/11/2026 05:00:53 pm )
CRL OP(MD) No. 25531 of 2026 To
1. Inspector Of Police, Pettai Pettai Police Station, Tiruneiveli District.
2. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. __________
( Uploaded on: 13/11/2026 05:00:53 pm )
CRL OP(MD) No. 25531 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. drm CRL.O.P.(MD) No.25531 of 2026 11-11-2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 13/11/2026 05:00:53 pm )