Madras High Court
(TM) A/56/2026 of SMT. MAHALAKSHMI AMMAL CHARITIES Vs M/S. SRI NARASUS COFFEE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED on 11 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
(TM) A Nos. 56, 57 and 58 of 2026
in
(T) OP (TM) Nos.212, 213 and 215 of 2023
Smt. Mahalakshmi Ammal Charities
R.P. Sarathy, K.R. Ramanujam, R.Visweswaran,
R. Indrani, P. Vanishree and V. Anuradha, Trading as Narasus Spinning Mills, R.C.
Chettypatty Post, Omalur Taluk,
Salem District - 636 455.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. M/s. Sri Narasus Coffee Company Private Limited P.B. No. 701, 16, Court Road, Johnsonpet, Hasthampatty ( Post)
Salem - 636 007.
2. Registrar of Trademarks,
Office of the Trademarks Registry, GST Road, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032.
..Respondent(s)
To permit the applicant/1st respondent to bring on record the additional documents mentioned in the table.
(TM) A No. 57 of 2026
To permit the applicant/1st respondent to bring on record the additional documents mentioned in the table.
(TM) A No. 58 of 2026
To permit the applicant/1st respondent to bring on record the additional documents mentioned in the table.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.M.S.Seshadri
For Respondent(s):
Ms.S.Suba Shiny, for R1
Mr.K.Subbu Ranga Bharathi, for R2
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
These three applications have been filed by the applicant / first respondent seeking permission to bring on record the additional documents.
2. The first respondent / petitioner has filed a common counter in the said applications seeking permission to bring on record the additional documents in respect of O.P.Nos.212, 213, 215 of 2023. The first respondent / petitioner has filed a common counter opposing the said request contending that the applications have been filed belated and no sufficient cause has been made out for permitting the applicant to produce the additional documents.
3. I have heard the learned counsel on either side and I have gone through the affidavits filed in support of these applications, as well as the common counter affidavit opposing the said request of the applicant / first respondent to bring on record additional documents as set out in the respective Judges' Summons.
4. I do not find any wilful or wanton act, or any act of omission, on the part of the first respondent in protracting the proceedings. The reasons assigned are also found to be satisfactory, justifying permission being accorded to the applicant/first respondent to bring on record additional documents, subject to proof, relevance and admissibility.
5. Accordingly, the applications are allowed. The applicant is permitted to produce the additional documents, subject to proof, relevance and admissibility.
6. The learned counsel for the parties have suggested a case management schedule.
7. In the light of the above, the case management schedule, as jointly suggested by the learned counsel for the parties, is accepted.
8. Post the matter before the learned Additional Master No. III on 18.01.2027.
9. The case management schedule shall proceed in terms of the schedule fixed today. 11-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No mk
P.B.BALAJI J. mk (TM) A Nos. 56, 57 and 58 of 2026 in (T) OP (TM) Nos.212, 213 and 215 of 2023 11-11-2026