Madras High Court
(TM) A/59/2026 of M/S. K. MOHANASUNDARAM Vs M/S. BHARANI SILK CENTRE on 11 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
(TM) A Nos. 59, 60, 61 and 62 of 2026
in
(T) OP (TM) Nos.181, 182, 183 and 347 of 2023
M/s. K. Mohanasundaram
Trading as Bharani Jewellers,
717, Nethaji Road, Erode - 638 001.
..Applicant(s)
Vs
1. M/s. Bharani Silk Centre,
Partnership Firm No. 64, R.K.V. Road,
Erode - 638 001, Tamil Nadu,
Represented by its Partner, Sri. N. Nallathambi.
2. The Deputy Registrar of Trademarks
Trade Marks Registry, Chennai.
..Respondent(s)
To permit to file documents listed in Annexure-A and receive and take on record the said documents as additional documents in the present rectification petition.
(TM) A No. 60 of 2026
To permit to file documents listed in Annexure-A and receive and take on record the said documents as additional documents in the present rectification petition.
(TM) A No. 61 of 2026
To permit to file documents listed in Annexure-A and receive and take on
record the said documents as additional documents in the present rectification petition.
(TM) A No. 62 of 2026
To Permit to file documents listed in Annexure-A and receive and take on record the said documents as additional documents in the present rectification petition.
For Petitioner(s):
Ms. S. Subashiny
For Respondent(s):
Mr.A.Swaminathan
for M/s.L.R.Swami & Co, for R1
Mr.S.Janarthanan, for R2
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant / petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.
2. These applications have been filed in the respective original petitions seeking permission to produce additional documents.
3. The learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner would concede that earlier applications had been filed by the applicant to bring on record additional documents.
4. The learned counsel for the respondents have no serious objection to the applications being allowed.
5. It is stated that the petitioner’s side evidence has been completed. However, considering that the respondents are yet to enter the witness box, no prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the applications are allowed.
6. Accordingly, both the applications are allowed. The applicant / petitioner is permitted to produce additional documents, subject to proof, relevance, and admissibility.
7. Post the matter before the learned Additional Master No.IV on 17.11.2026. 11-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No mk
P.B.BALAJI J. mk (TM) A Nos. 59, 60, 61 and 62 of 2026 in (T) OP (TM) Nos.181, 182, 183 and 347 of 2023 11-11-2026