Madras High Court
WP/27305/2026 of K.Narayanan Vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR on 11 November 2026
WP No. 27305 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN
WP No. 27305 of 2026
CNR: {HCMA011436902026}
1. K.Narayanan,
S/o. Krishnan,
Main Road,
Valayampattu Village,
Tiruvennainallur Taluk,
Villupuram District.
2. Balaji,
S/o. Narayanan,
Main Road,
Valayampattu Village,
Tiruvennainallur Taluk,
Villupuram District
3. Aruljothi
S/o. Narayanan,
Main Road,
Valayampattu Village,
Tiruvennainallur Taluk,
Villupuram District.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The District Collector,
Villupuram District, Villupuram.
2. The Tahsildar
Tiruvennainallur Taluk,
Tiruvennainallur, Villupuram District.
3. The Block Development Officer,
Tiruvennainallur Panchayat Union Office, Tiruvennainallur, Villupuram District.
__________
( Uploaded on: 13/11/2026 04:18:18 pm )
WP No. 27305 of 2026
4. Remesh,
S/o. Rajavel,
Melamangalam Village,
Tiruvennainallur Taluk,
Villupuram District.
5. Venkatesh,
S/o. Rajavel,
Melamangalam Village,
Tiruvennainallur Taluk,
Villupuram District.
..Respondent(s)
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioners’
representation dated 26.09.2025 and to pass orders directing the 2nd respondent to remove the encroachment made by the respondents 4 and 5 by constructed wall in public road in S.No. 2/6 situated at Valayampattu village, Tiruvennainallur Taluk, Villupuram District within a reasonable time frame fixed by this Honble court and to made facility to the petitioners for easy access to their land in S.No. 2/8.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.S.Natarajan
For Respondent(s):
Mr.B.Sivakollapan
Government Advocate for R1 & R2
Mr.D.Yashwanth Rajan
Government Advocate for R3
No appearance – R4 & R5
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam, J.) This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation dated __________
( Uploaded on: 13/11/2026 04:18:18 pm )
WP No. 27305 of 2026 26.09.2025 and to pass orders directing the 2nd respondent to remove the encroachment made by the respondents 4 and 5 by constructing wall in public road in S.No.2/6 situated at Valayampattu Village, Tiruvennainallur Taluk, Villupuram District.
2. The Block Development Officer, Tiruvennainallur filed a counter affidavit stating that the survey has been conducted and the authorities found that there is no encroachment in the subject property. Paragraph 4 & 5 of the said counter affidavit reads as under: “4. It is respectfully submitted that there is no mention of public property in any of the documents as claimed by the petitioners. As per the report of the 2nd respondent in his letter No.A4/985/2026 dated 10.07.2025, the questionable site situated in Survey No.2/8 at an extent of 0.16.0 aeres is the property of the petitioners while the site adjacent to it in Survey No.2/6 is the property of the 4th and 5th respondents. The petitioners are seeking relief and removal of encroachment in Survey No.2/6 which is the private patta of the respondents 4 and 5 and therefore, there is no encroachment as such in the questionable site.
5. It is respectfully submitted that the 2nd respondent in the above has further stated that in the Revenue record does not reveal anything about paattai or vandipaathai (path) and therefore, the land owned by the respondents 4 and 5 is a private land and as such the claim of the 1st petitioner that the alleged encroachment in Survey No.2/6-0.67.5 cannot be entertained.” __________
( Uploaded on: 13/11/2026 04:18:18 pm )
WP No. 27305 of 2026
3. In the above factual position, no further consideration needs to be undertaken. Consequently, this writ petition stands dismissed. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.R.V.,J.) 11-11-2026 (1/2) Index: Yes Speaking Neutral Citation: Yes/No KKN __________
( Uploaded on: 13/11/2026 04:18:18 pm )
WP No. 27305 of 2026 To
1. The District Collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram.
2. The Tahsildar Tiruvennainallur Taluk, Tiruvennainallur, Villupuram District.
3. The Block Development Officer, Tiruvennainallur Panchayat Union Office, Tiruvennainallur, Villupuram District. __________
( Uploaded on: 13/11/2026 04:18:18 pm )
WP No. 27305 of 2026 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN, J. KKN WP No. 27305 of 2026 11-11-2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 13/11/2026 04:18:18 pm )
WP No. 27305 of 2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 13/11/2026 04:18:18 pm )