Madras High Court

WP/45902/2026 of Satha Konar Vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR on 11 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 45902 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11-11-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN

WP No. 45902 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA012682922026}

AND

WMP NO. 51551 OF 2026

Satha Konar

S/o. Manickam Konar,

Door No. 38/79 , North street,

Athiyenthal Village, Murukkampadi Post,

Vanapuram Taluk, Kallakurichi district

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Collector

Kallakurichi district

2. The Revenue Tahsildar

Vanapuram

3. The Assistant Engineer

Irrigation Division,

Water Resources Department, vanapuram

4. Revenue Divisional officer

Kallakurichi

5. Satha Konar

S/o. Chakravarthy Konar,

Velayampalayam Village,

Tiruvannamalai Taluk (and ) District

..Respondent(s)

WP No. 45902 of 2026

Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 1st respondent culminating in the Impugned order bearing Rc. No. Aa5/ 1632/ 2026 dated 17.09.2026

passed by the 1st respondent.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.K.Kousik

For Respondent(s):

Mr/C.Prabhakaran

Special Government Pleader For R 1-4

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The order of the District Collector dated 17.09.2026 is under challenge in the present writ petition.

2. A perusal of the order impugned would show that the procedures as contemplated for adjudication of the dispute relating encroachment were followed. The petitioner's statement was considered by the District Collector, who, after conducting an enquiry, made a finding that after obtaining permission from the Water Resources Department, the petitioner has changed the route of the channel and encroached upon the portion of the channel, more specifically in the concluding paragraph, the District Collector has stated that the authorities have conducted the survey and inspection and submitted a report. Based on the report, the water channel was going through Survey

WP No. 45902 of 2026 Nos.29/2A, 29/2F, 29/2C, 29/2D1A, 29/2D1B, 29/2D3, 29/2E and 29/2H situated at Mutukambadi Village and S.No.37/5B situated at Athiyenthal Village, Vanapuram Taluk, Kallakurichi District and thereafter it reaches the Athiyenthal Lake. The said channel route was in existence for long years. The petitioner has destroyed the channel by causing obstruction and diverted the route of the channel and therefore, the authorities have initiated action for removal of encroachments.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any such action as stated in the order passed by the District Collector. The subject land is a Patta land and in order to secure water for irrigation purposes, he has formed a channel in his own land.

4. Such disputed facts cannot be adjudicated in a writ proceedings. The revenue authorities had conducted a survey and submitted a report. Based on the report as well as the statement recorded from the petitioner, the District Collector has taken a decision. If at all the petitioner claims that he has not committed any such irregularity and whatever he has done, is in his Patta land only and therefore, it cannot be considered as encroachment, he has to approach the competent civil court of law for redressal of his grievance. The authorities have found that the route of the channel has been changed by

WP No. 45902 of 2026 causing obstructions and destroying a portion of the channel by the petitioner and such allegations are serious in nature and more so the deviation is made in the water body, which is impermissible.

5. With the above observations, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.R.V.,J.) 11-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KST To

1. The District Collector Kallakurichi district.

2. The Revenue Tahsildar Vanapuram

3. The Assistant Engineer Irrigation Division, Water Resources Department, vanapuram

4. Revenue Divisional officer Kallakurichi

WP No. 45902 of 2026 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN J. KST WP No. 45902 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 51551 OF 2026 11-11-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead