Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
MRS. RAKESH RANI AND ANOTHER vs CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA on 30 October 2026
**DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI**
**Misc. Appeal No.380/2026**
**Arising out of SA No.2200/2026(DRT-II, Chandigarh)**
**Item No. 2**
**Mrs. Rakesh Rani & another
V.
Central Bank of India**
**30.10.2026 Hon'ble Dr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain**
Present: Ms. Shalini, Advocate for appellants through VC
Ms. Reema Khorana, Advocate for respondent through VC
This matter is taken up through Hybrid hearing.
**ORDER (ORAL)**
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. 1. The appellants filed S.A. vide NDN No.2200/2026 titled as **Mrs. Rakesh Rani and another V Central Bank of India** which is stated to be pending before DRT-II, Chandigarh. DRT-II, Chandigarh vide impugned order dated 16.09.2026 has declined to grant interim relief for restraining the respondent/Central Bank of India for taking physical possession of the subject property in favour of the appellant. The appellant being aggrieved filed the present appeal.
2. 2. The perusal of the order reflects that the possession was scheduled on 16.09.2026 but it could not be taken thereafter the possession was rescheduled on 28.10.2026 as conveyed by the counsel for the appellant but on 28.10.2026 also, the possession could not be taken.
3. 3. Ms. Reema Khorana, Advocate for the respondent/Central Bank of India stated that the possession could not be taken on 28.10.2026 due to the visit of Hon'ble dignitary and as and when the possession is proposed to be taken, in view of that eventuality, the notice shall be given to the appellants.
4. 4. In view of these submissions, the present appeal is disposed of with the liberty to the appellant to file fresh application for seeking restraint order against the respondent bank/court receiver in case fresh notice for taking possession is given to the appellant in accordance with law.
5. DRT-II, Chandigarh is also directed if such application is filed then the said application be decided without any delay.
6. The present appeal along with pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
SD/- 2
**(Dr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain Chairperson**
-v§