Central Administrative Tribunal
Ravi Raj Kumar vs DELHI POLICE on 12 November 2026
Central Administrative Tribunal
Principal Bench: New Delhi
O.A. No.4538/2026
This the 12th day of November, 2026
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A)
Ravi Raj Kumar S/o Shri Shivnandan Yadav, R/o Vill Bahadurpur, Post Office-Sartha, Dist. - Nalanda, Bihar-803110
Presently: At New Delhi
…Applicant
(By Advocate: Mr. Aman Bhardwaj)
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Commissioner, Delhi Police, Delhi Police Headquarters, Jai Singh Road, New Delhi 110001.
2. Add. Commissioner of Police (Recruitment), Delhi Police, New Police Lines, Kingsway Camp, Delhi – 110 009.
…Respondents
(By Advocate: Ms. D. Vijayalakshmi)
SNEHA MEENA
ORDER (ORAL)
By Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
In the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant seeks the following reliefs: “a) Direct the respondents to bring on record all the records with respect to applicant's PHYSICAL ENDURANCE & MEASUREMENT TEST including video footage.
b) Direct the respondent to give a fair chance to the applicant to clear the left-over stages of PHYSICAL ENDURANCE & MEASUREMENT TEST.
c) Direct the respondents to consider the all the stages which has been qualified by the applicant previously and the applicant may not be put to undergo the stages which he has already qualified. And the stages of PHYSICAL ENDURANCE & MEASUREMENT TEST which he has already qualified.
d) Direct the respondent to pay cost of the litigation.
e) Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Tribunal thinks appropriate in the circumstances of the case.”
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant’s representation dated 23.09.2026 (Annexure A-1 colly.) is still pending consideration before the respondents. He further submits that the applicant would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondents to dispose of the aforesaid representation by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated time frame.
3. Issue notice. Ms. D. Vijayalakshmi, learned counsel, appears and accepts notice on behalf of the SNEHA MEENA
respondents. She seeks some time to obtain appropriate instructions in the matter.
4. In view of the limited prayer made, without entering into the merits of the case, the present O.A. is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the aforesaid representation by passing a reasoned and speaking order, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
5. A copy of the speaking order so passed shall be provided to the applicant.
6. The OA is disposed of in the aforesaid terms, without going into the merits, at the admission stage itself. Pending MAs, if any, shall also stand disposed of accordingly.
7. No order as to costs.
(Rajinder Kashyap) (Manish Garg) Member (A)
Member (J)
/sm/ SNEHA MEENA