CHANDRA SHEKHAR vs GNCTD on 12 November 2026

1. Government of N.C.T. Delhi [through/service to be effected upon: Its Chief Secretary, at: 5th level, Delhi Secretariat, I.P. Estate, New Delhi: 110002.]

2. Department of Health & Family Welfare, Government of N.C.T. Delhi, [Through/service to be effected upon its: Principal Secretary, at: 9th Level, Delhi Secretariat, I.P. Estate, New Delhi: 110002.]

3. Burari Hospital, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of N.C.T. Delhi, [through/service to be effected upon/through its: Medical Superintendent, at: Kaushik Enclave, Burari, Delhi: 110084.]

4. Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of N.C.T. Delhi, [through/service to be effected upon/through its: Medical Superintendent, at: H-4/5, Guru Harkishan Marg, Pitampura, Delhi: 110034]

5. Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board, Government of N.C.T. Delhi, [Through/service to be effected upon its: Chairman, at: FC – 18, Institutional Area, Karkardooma, near Railway Reservation Centre, Delhi-110092] …Respondents (By Advocates: Mr. H.A. Khan;

Mr. Amit Anand for DSSSB)

SNEHA MEENA

ORDER (ORAL)

By Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)

In the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant seeks the following reliefs: “a. Quash and Set Aside the Memorandum of cancellation issued vide no. F.1(47)/BH#002418/2025-26/Admin/Posting of Paramedical Staff/11414 dated 21.10.2026 [Annexure A–1];

b. Directing the Respondents to forthwith consider reply/representation of the Applicant [Annexure A–4] as given qua 'Deficiency Memorandum' and if found otherwise eligible, to appoint the Applicant as/to the post of 'Technician (OT/CSSD)' under 'SC' category with all consequential reliefs and benefits including full back wages, seniority and if found ineligible for appointment, then to pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon;

c. Costs of this Application may also be granted to the Applicants;

d. Pass any such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case to grant complete relief to the Applicant.”

2. Highlighting the facts of the case, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the candidature of the applicant has been rejected on the ground of non-submission of the requisite documents, as mentioned in the deficiency memorandum dated 14.10.2026. To counter the said objection, learned counsel draws our attention to representation dated SNEHA MEENA

19.10.2026 (Annexure A-4), along with the supporting documents submitted by the applicant to the competent authority.

3. Learned counsel further submits that the aforesaid representation has not been considered by the respondents while passing the impugned order dated 21.10.2026. It is also noticed that the deficiencies initially pointed out by the respondents vide memorandum dated 08.10.2026 have been specifically addressed by the applicant in the aforesaid representation.

4. Be that as it may, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, the present OA is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the representation dated 19.10.2026, uninfluenced by the observations, if any, contained in the impugned order dated 21.10.2026, by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

5. The O.A. stands disposed of in terms of the aforesaid directions, at the admission stage itself. SNEHA MEENA

6. Pending M.A.s, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

(Rajinder Kashyap) (Manish Garg) Member (A)

Member (J)

/sm/ SNEHA MEENA