Central Administrative Tribunal
P Sharma vs Dr. Purvi Pokhriyal DIRECTOR L.N.J.P M/O HOME AFFAIRS on 12 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH 61/35, COPERNICUS MARG,NEW DELHI-110001 Order Sheet Item no.: 20 C.P./752/2024 (DELHI) [ CONTEMPT PETITION ] [ SENIOR CITIZEN ] In R.A./39/2025 REVIEW APPLICATION Court No.: 3 No of Adjournment: 12 Order Dated: 12/11/2026 P SHARMA Vs DR. PURVI POKHRIYAL DIRECTOR L.N.J.P M/O HOME AFFAIRS
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. N S Dalal For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Bijendra Singh Sharma with Mr. Ranjit Singh, Mr. D S Mahendru Order of The Tribunal C.P./752/2024 in R.A./39/2025 in O.A./3976/2018 Pursuant to order dated 27.02.2026, the matter is taken up today.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents, at the outset, submits that he has filed the status affidavit and also an M.A. seeking exemption from personal appearance. He further submits that the matter was taken up before the competent authority very recently on 09.11.2026 and the competent authority has issued the necessary orders and has conveyed its no objection for the challenge to the order of the Tribunal and the reviewed its order passed in R.A./39/2025. He submits that in view of the NOC having been granted by the Ministry, the respondents are pursuing to challenge the same before the Hon'ble High Court.
3. The aforesaid submission is vehemently opposed by the learned counsel for the applicant. He submits that the review petition filed by the respondents was itself dismissed on 15.07.2026 and the order passed in the O.A. is of 01.05.2024 and since July, 2026 and thereafter, the applicant has been pressing the present contempt petition for compliance and the status affidavit is nothing but delaying and aggravating activity on the part of the respondents.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that he has a right to avail the legal remedy.
5. Be that as it may. The respondents may avail legal remedy but it should be within reasonable time.
6. We note that the Review Petition was already dismissed in July, 2026 and four months have already been gone by. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi recently in W.P. (C) No. 9541/2025 has passed the order.
7. In view of the aforesaid, the respondents are directed to report complete compliance on 15.12.2026, subject to the outcome of the Writ Petition, if so.
Sanjeeva Kumar Member (A) Harvinder Kaur Oberoi Member (J) Dhruv Mehra ( steno 'd' )