Central Administrative Tribunal
Goverdhan Kumar vs RAILWAY BOARD on 13 November 2026
Patna
Bench
HON’BL
HO
Gover
Krishn
Sikan
presen
office
Distt.
Union
Bhaw
For Appl
For Resp
______
1. Heard le
2. This app
3. The app
Officer
whereby
applican
name o
respond
4. We find
necessar
CENTRAL ADMINISTRA
PATNA BENCH,
O.A. No. 050/000
C O R A M
LE JUSTICE MR. NARENDRA KU
ON’BLE MR. KUMAR RAJESH C
rdhan Kumar, male, aged abo
na Prasad, Resident of Siddh
darpur, Nasriganj, Digha, D
ntly posted as Deputy Chief S
of General Manager, East
- Vaishali, Bihar-844101.
Versus
n of India through The Sec
wan, Raisina Road, Central Sec
licant:-
Mr. Anku
pondents:-
Mr. T.N.
____________________
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Per: Mr. Kumar Rajesh C earned counsel for both the pa plication is at notice stage hea plicant seeks quashing of th Order No. E(O)III-2026/T y two officials namely Sh nt, Goverdhan Kumar have be of Shri Rakesh Rawal has dent in the present O.A. d that the aforesaid offici ry party to the proceeding as O.A. No. 050/000768/2026 ATIVE TRIBUNAL , PATNA
Date of order:- 13.11.2026 M UMAR JOHARI, MEMBER [J] CHANDRA, MEMBER [A] out 42 years, son of Late Bal hipriya, Biscuit Factory Road, District-Patna, Bihar-800012, Safety Officer/Electrical in the t Central Railway, Hajipur,
………Applicant s cretary, Railway Board, Rail cretariat, New Delhi-110001. ……..Respondent ur Apurv Singh, ld. ASC Thakur, ld. Sr. CGSC __________________ R (Oral) Chandra, Member (A): arties. aring. he impugned order/Railway TR/400 dated 28.08.2026, hri Rakesh Rawal and the een transferred. However, the not been impleaded as a al (Shri Rakesh Rawal) is any adjudication resulting in l , , e , l t y , e e a s n Digitally signed by POOJA KUMARI POOJA KUMARI
Patna Bench setting rights a relief cla not mer maintain seek a r not been
5. In view necessar respond limine necessar
6. No ord
(Kumar
Me
pk/- aside this impugned order w and interest. No effective and aimed can, therefore, be made rely formal or technical, but nability of O.A. in its present relief having direct civil cons n afforded an opportunity of h w of the aforesaid fundamen ry party, we are not inclin dents. Accordingly, the Origin at the notice stage on the ry party. der as to costs. r Rajesh Chandra) (N ember (A)
O.A. No. 050/000768/2026 would directly affect his civil d binding adjudication of the e in his absence. The defect is goes to the very root of the t form. The applicant cannot sequence for person who has hearing. ntal defect of non-joinder of ned to issue notice to the al Application is dismissed in e ground of non-joinder of Narendra Kumar Johari) Member (J)
l e s e t s f e n f Digitally signed by POOJA KUMARI POOJA KUMARI