Central Administrative Tribunal
NARESH KUMAR vs EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY on 13 November 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PATNA BENCH
PATNA
C.P. No. 050/00005/2025
(IN O.A. 050/00198/2024)
Dated :- 13.11.2026
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kr. Johari, Judicial Member Hon’ble Mr. Kumar Rajesh Chandra, Administrative Member
In the matter of :
Naresh Kumar,
S/o Shri Raghunandan Prasad, Ex Accounts Assistant under Financial Advisor & Chief Accounts Officer (Construction) of East Central Railway, Mahendru Ghat, Patna (Bihar), Pin- 800004 and Resident of Village- Math Laxmanpur, Patna Sadar, District- Patna(Bihar), Pin-
800007.
………….Petitioner
VS.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Shri Chhatrasal Singh, The General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur, District- Vaishali (Bihar)- Pin- 844101.
2. Ms. Chhavi Jha, The Principal Financial Advisor, E. C. Railway, Hajipur, District- Vaishali (Bihar), Pin- 844101.
3. Shri Vijay Tukaram Kadam, the Financial Advisor & Chief Accounts Officer, (Construction), East Central Railway, Mahendru Ghat, Patna (Bihar), Pin- 800004.
........ Respondents
For The Applicant(s): Mr. Sunil Kumar
For The Respondent(s): Mr. Neeraj Nandan
Sonali Lal Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Location:
Sonali Lal
O R D E R (ORAL) Per : Kumar Rajesh Chandra, Member (A)
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The instant Contempt Petition has been instituted alleging wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Tribunal in OA No. 198/2024.
3. Subsequently, the respondents in the OA challenged the order of this Tribunal before the Hon’ble High Court of Patna by filing CWJC No. 19194 of 2025. The Hon’ble High Court, vide its order, has substantially modified the order passed by this Tribunal, thereby altering the original directions issued in the OA. Consequently, the original order of this Tribunal no longer survives in its unmodified form, having merged into the subsequent order passed by the Hon’ble High Court.
4. Learned Counsel for the respondents has further apprised this Bench that the applicant in the OA has already preferred MJC No. 3158 of 2026 before the Hon’ble High Court of Patna, seeking initiation of contempt proceedings for alleged non-compliance with the directions contained in the order passed by the Hon’ble High Court.
Sonali Lal Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Location:
Sonali Lal
5. In view of the aforesaid factual and legal position, particularly in view of the substantial modification of the original order of this Tribunal by the Hon’ble High Court and the subsequent initiation of contempt proceedings before the Hon’ble High Court in respect of alleged non-compliance with its directions, no cause survives for further adjudication of the present Contempt Petition before this Tribunal.
6. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition stands dropped.
7. Notices issued to the respondents, stand discharged.
Sd/-
Sd/- (Kumar Rajesh Chandra) (Justice Narendra Kr. Johari) Administrative Member
Judicial Member
sl
Sonali Lal Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Location:
Sonali Lal