Central Administrative Tribunal
SUNIL KUMAR vs KVS on 13 November 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PATNA BENCH
PATNA
O.A. No. 050/00863/2022
Dated :- 13.11.2026
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kr. Johari, Judicial Member Hon’ble Mr. Kumar Rajesh Chandra, Administrative Member
In the matter of :
Sunil Kumar,
S/o Sri Ram Kripal Choudhary, resident of Village & PO- Bharso, PS- Parbatta, District- Khagaria, At present employed as Trained Graduate Teacher (Maths) at Kendriya Vidyalaya BSF, Kishanganj, Bihar- 855107.
…………. Applicant
VS.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Education, New Delhi- 110001.
2. The Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Institutional Area, Saheed Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi- 110016.
3. The Joint Commissioner (Admin-1), Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Institutional Area, Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi- 110016.
4. The Deputy Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Regional Office, Lohia Nagar, Kankarbagh, Patna- 800020.
5. The Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, BSF Kishanganj, Bihar- 855107.
........ Respondents
For The Applicant(s): Mr. Jayant Kumar Karn, Counsel
For The Respondent(s): Mr. G. K. Agarwal, ASC
Sonali Lal Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Location:
Sonali Lal
O R D E R (ORAL) Per : Kumar Rajesh Chandra, Administrative Member Learned Counsel for the parties are present and heard.
2. The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 praying for the following relief: “A. The action of the controlling authority of applicant, the Principal Kendriya Vidyalaya, BSF Kishanganj in not providing the applicant link to participate in Limited Departmental Examination against the post of PGT (Physics), in terms of Notification dated 02-11- 2022, as contained in Annexure-A/1, may be declared erroneous. B. The respondent authorities may be directed to provide link to applicant to enable him to participate in Limited Departmental Examination for consideration of his promotion against the post of Post Graduate Teacher (Physics) and thereafter to consider his candidature upon merits in terms of Notification dated 02-11-2022, as contained in Annexure- A/1. C. Any other relief/ reliefs as the applicant is entitled and your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the ends of justice.”
3. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the sole relief sought in the present OA was to grant permission to the applicant to participate in the Limited Departmental Examination for the post of PGT (Physics). He further submits that the applicant was duly permitted to participate in the said examination, though he could not qualify the same.
4. Learned Counsel for the respondents has also expressed a similar view and submitted that the matter has become infructuous.
Sonali Lal Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Location:
Sonali Lal
5. In view of the aforesaid submission, it is evident that the substantive relief sought by the applicant in the present OA has already been granted. Consequently, no further cause survives for adjudication, and the OA has been rendered infructuous.
6. Accordingly, the OA having been rendered infructuous, is dismissed as such. No order as to costs.
Sd/-
Sd/- (Kumar Rajesh Chandra) (Justice Narendra Kr. Johari) Administrative Member
Judicial Member
sl
Sonali Lal Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Location:
Sonali Lal