Central Administrative Tribunal
Goverdhan Kumar vs EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY on 13 November 2026
Patna
Bench
HON’BL
HO
Goverdh
Krishna
Sikanda
presentl
office of
Vaishali
1. Union o
Hajipur
2. Principa
Hajipur
For Appl
For Resp
______
1. Heard le
2. This app
3. The app
Order N
officials
applican
officials
CENTRAL ADMINISTRA
PATNA BENCH,
O.A. No. 050/000
C O R A M
LE JUSTICE MR. NARENDRA KU
ON’BLE MR. KUMAR RAJESH C
han Kumar, male, aged abou
a Prasad, Resident of Siddhi
arpur, Nasriganj, Digha, Di
ly posted as Deputy Chief Sa
f General Manager, East Cen
i, Bihar-844101.
Versus
of India through General Ma
r, Dist. -Vaishali, Bihar-84410
al Chief Electrical Engine
r, Dist.- Vaishali, Bihar-84410
licant:-
Mr. Anku
pondents:-
Mr. T.N.
____________________
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Per: Mr. Kumar Rajesh C earned counsel for both the pa plication is at notice stage hea plicant seeks quashing of the i No. GAZ/153/2026 dated 2 have been transferred. Inc nt does not even figure in thi has been impleaded as a resp O.A. No. 050/000763/2026 ATIVE TRIBUNAL , PATNA
Date of order:- 13.11.2026 M UMAR JOHARI, MEMBER [J] CHANDRA, MEMBER [A] ut 42 years, son of Late Bal ipriya, Biscuit Factory Road, istrict-Patna, Bihar-800012, afety Officer/Electrical in the ntral Railway, Hajipur, Distt.-
………Applicant s anager, East Central Railway, eer, East Central Railway,
01. ……..Respondents ur Apurv Singh, ld. ASC Thakur, ld. Sr. CGSC __________________ R (Oral) Chandra, Member (A): arties. aring. impugned order/ECR Officer 22.06.2026, whereby seven cidentally, the name of the is order. None of these seven pondent in the present O.A.
l , , e - , , s r n e n Digitally signed by POOJA KUMARI POOJA KUMARI
Patna Bench
4. We find proceed impugn interest claimed merely maintain seek a r not been
5. In view necessar respond limine necessar
6. No ord
(Kumar
Me
pk/- d that the aforesaid officials ding as any adjudication res ed order would directly a . No effective and binding d can, therefore, be made in th formal or technical, but go nability of O.A. in its present elief having direct civil conse n afforded an opportunity of h w of the aforesaid fundamen ry parties, we are not incli dents. Accordingly, the Origin at the notice stage on the ry party. der as to costs. r Rajesh Chandra) (N ember (A)
O.A. No. 050/000763/2026 are necessary parties to the sulting in setting aside this ffect their civil rights and g adjudication of the relief heir absence. The defect is not oes to the very root of the t form. The applicant cannot quence for persons who have hearing. ntal defect of non-joinder of ined to issue notice to the al Application is dismissed in e ground of non-joinder of Narendra Kumar Johari) Member (J)
e s d f t e t e f e n f Digitally signed by POOJA KUMARI POOJA KUMARI