F SEBASTIAN TITUS vs john thomas on 12 November 2026

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM Order Sheet Item no.: 6 C.P./46/2020 (ERNAKULAM) [ CPC ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 46 Order Dated: 12/11/2026 F SEBASTIAN TITUS Vs JOHN THOMAS For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Martin G. Thottan For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mrs. Sumathi Dandapani, Senior, Mr. N.K. Subramanian Notes of The Registry Order of The Tribunal Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Counsel for the Railways assisted by the learned Standing Counsel. Our attention has been drawn to paragraph 2 of the objection, wherein it is stated that in relation to petitioner No.1, with effect from March, 2010 till March 2015, Grade Pay drawn is shown as Rs. 4800/-. According to the petitioner, in fact petioner No. 1 was granted only the Grade Pay of Rs. 4600/- during this period. It was stated that, Grade Pay was revised by a subsequent order, and arrears recovered at the time of applicant's retirement. This anomaly has not been reflected in the due-drawn statement, it is submitted. Regarding the 2nd petitioner also, identical contention is set up. Having heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Counsel for the Railways, we are inclined to direct the respondents to verify and correct the anomaly to keep the records straight and to ensure that the calculation made is correct. List on 15.12.2026. V RAMA MATHEW MEMBER (A) JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS MEMBER (J) A X ( steno 'c' )

Case No C.P./46/2020 Ernakulam Bench List In: Main causelist Item No. 6 Generated by Sherin A.X CAT Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Bench on 12/11/2026

2026.11.13 13:48:56 +05'30' A X Sherin