Central Administrative Tribunal
Sinitha Rajan vs Integrated Head Quarters (NAVY) on 12 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM Order Sheet Item no.: 13 O.A./264/2026 (ERNAKULAM) [ PROMOTION ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 4 Order Dated: 12/11/2026 SINITHA RAJAN Vs INTEGRATED HEAD QUARTERS (NAVY) For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. T.C. Govindaswamy For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mrs. Anila Umesh, ACGSC Notes of The Registry Order of The Tribunal
Reply statement has not been filed in spite of last chance granted. Learned ACGSC submitted that reply statement is ready and is awaiting signature. We are inclined to grant 10 days' time to file reply, failing which, respondents will be directed to appear in person and answer the allegations raised in the OA. Call on 30.11.2026. V RAMA MATHEW MEMBER (A) JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS MEMBER (J) A X ( steno 'c' )
Case No O.A./264/2026 Ernakulam Bench List In: Main causelist Item No. 13 Generated by Sherin A.X CAT Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Bench on 12/11/2026
2026.11.13 13:49:06 +05'30' A X Sherin