Central Administrative Tribunal

Vikas Srivastava vs DEFENCE PRODUCTION on 13 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD Order Sheet Item no.: 6 O.A./298/2026 (ALLAHABAD) [ RECOVERY ] With M.A./5766/2026 DELAY CONDON APPL Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 7 Order Dated: 13/11/2026 VIKAS SRIVASTAVA Vs DEFENCE PRODUCTION

For Applicant(s) Advocate :

For Respondent(s) Advocate : Order of The Tribunal Shri Ashish Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, and Shri Krishna Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the respondents, are present and heard. Although the matter is listed under the heading of “For Admission”, learned counsel for the applicant states that he will not file the rejoinder affidavit. Learned counsel for both the parties are agreeable to address the matter on merit at this stage itself. Heard learned counsel for both the parties. Order is reserved. Justice Om Prakash VII Member (J)

Madhu Kumari ( steno 'c' )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead