Daily order sheet, C1, 06 Nov 2026 on 6 November 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

5. Case needs adjudication.

6. Admit.

7. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

8. List on 07.07.2027.

(Maj. Gen. Sanjay Singh) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 2) OA No. 1088 of 2026

MWO (HFO) Sanjeev Kumar Mishra

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Advocate

Shri Krishan Kumar Singh, Advocate Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Indra Mani Tripathi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List revised.

2. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

3. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

4. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

5. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

6. Case needs adjudication.

7. Admit.

8. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

9. List on 07.07.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 3)

OA No. 1092 of 2026 with MA No. 1305 of 2026

Sub Maj Kamlesh Prasad Mishra (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma, Advocate Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List revised.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Keshav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing. Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present today. Memo of appearance has also not been given.

3. In the interest of justice, put up this case for admission on the next date.

4. List on 11.12.2026.

Maj. Gen. Sanjay Singh) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 4)

Ex-A. No. 324 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 263 of 2024

Ex Sgt Ram Nitin Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey, Advocate

Shri RK Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri VP Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 06.04.2026 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 263 of 2024.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

6. List on 07.07.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 5)

Ex-A. No. 325 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 396 of 2025

Ex MWO Basavanneppa Basappa Maled

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey, Advocate

Shri RK Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri VP Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 27.02.2026 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 396 of 2025.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

6. List on 07.07.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 6)

OA No. 1034 of 2026 with MA No. 1243 of 2026

Ex Sub Maj Ramakant Mishra

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Parijaat Belaura, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing. M.A. No. 1243 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of 03 months and 16 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 1034 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 07.07.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 75 of 2023 Inre: TA No. 11 of 2022 MWO Tripti Kumar Mishra (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court. Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing. Departmental Representative is also present for the respondents.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the applicant and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that writ petition which is filed by the UoI is duly dismissed on 07.09.2026 so the respondents are bound to obey the order in letter and spirit.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit. If compliance affidavit is not filed till the next date, coercive action shall be taken against the respondents.

6. List on 06.07.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Sl. No.2)

Ex-A. No. 145 of 2023 with MA No. 297 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 655 of 2022

Ex Sub Maj (Hony LT) Vinod Kumar Upadhyay

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KP Datta, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KP Datta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In this case, the O.A was decided on 14.11.2022. About four years have already passed, writ petition which was filed by the respondents is duly dismissed on 17.04.2026 and seven months have already passed but order has been complied with.

5. Departmental Representative submits that she has no instructions regarding implementation of the order.

6. In these circumstances, there is no other option, Chief Record Officer, EME Records shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

7. List on 06.07.2027.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

9. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of Chief Record Officer, EME Records.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 188 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 504 of 2023

Ex Hav Nahar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that writ petition which was filed by the respondents assailing the order of this Bench is duly dismissed on 24.09.2026 but the order has not been complied with.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

6. List on 06.07.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 235 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 538 of 2022

Maj Gen Brijesh Kumar Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In this case, the O.A was decided on 09.01.2023. Three and half years have already passed, writ petition which was filed by the respondents is duly dismissed on 18.05.2026 and about six months have already passed but order has been complied with.

5. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

6. List on 06.07.2027.

7. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

8. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 195 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 33 of 2023

Ex ACP Nb Sub Rabindra Yadaw

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KP Datta, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KP Datta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In this case, the O.A was decided on 24.07.2023. Three years have already passed, writ petition which was filed by the respondents is duly dismissed on 08.07.2026 and about four months have already passed but order has been complied with.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that he has no instructions in the matter.

6. In these circumstances, there is no other option, Chief Record Officer, AMC Records shall be present before this Tribunal on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

7. List on 07.07.2027.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

9. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of Chief Record Officer, AMC Records.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 327 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 1082 of 2023

Ex Hav Shailesh Kumar Ray

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In this case, the O.A was decided on 22.03.2024. Two and half years have already passed but order has been complied with.

5. Respondents’ counsel stated that he has no instructions regarding compliance of the order.

6. In these circumstances, there is no other option, Chief Record Officer, ASC Records (South) shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

7. Cost of Rs. 20,000/- already deposited by the respondents shall be remitted to the applicant. All the cost due against the respondents be deposited in the Registry till the next date.

8. List on 07.07.2027.

9. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

10. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of Chief Record Officer, ASC Records.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 380 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 669 of 2023 Ex MCEL (R) I (Hony Lt) Lalji Srivastava

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri DK Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri DK Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. Compliance affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. PPO has been issued on 03.06.2026 and payment of arrears alongwith interest has also been made to the applicant.

4. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 443 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 1530 of 2023

Major Ajay Gupta(Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Aditya Singh Puar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Aditya Singh Puar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that he wants to file impleadment application and seeks some more time for the same. Time as prayed is allowed. He may move impleadment application till the next date of listing.

3. List on 22.02.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A No. 152 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 514 of 2024

Air Commodore BS Yadav (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Y Venugopal, Advocate

Shri Amit Asthana, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Amit Asthana, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present virtually.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Departmental Representative submits that he has no instructions in the matter.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit on payment of cost of Rs. 5,000/- in the Registry which shall be remitted to the applicant.

6. List on 07.07.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 156 of 2026 Inre; OA No 796 of 2023

Ex Sub Maj (Hony LT) Om Prakash Pandey

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey , Advocate

Shri RK Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Kavita Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri VP Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Kavita Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that Writ Petition No. 7321 of 2025 has been filed assailing the order of this Tribunal before the Hon’ble High Court but there is no stay order. She stated that matter is subjudice and on basis of this writ petition seeks adjournment.

5. In these circumstances, respondents are directed to make compliance of the order provisionally subject to final outcome of the Writ Petition filed before the Hon’ble High Court after obtaining an undertaking on affidavit from the applicant to the effect that, in case, any adverse order is passed against him, he would return all the amount, if any, and comply with the order of the Hon’ble High Court passed in Writ Petition.

6. As prayed by learned counsel for the respondents four weeks further time is granted to comply the order provisionally and file provisional compliance affidavit.

7. List on 07.07.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 157 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 829 of 2024

JWO Chandan Kumar Mishra (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Ms. Upasana Mishra, Advocate Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Advocate Ms. Tanya Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Devesh Kumar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court. Shri Devesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present today. Departmental Representative is present for the respondents.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the applicant and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Departmental Representative submits that writ petition No. 14741 of 2025 filed by the respondents is duly dismissed on 22.09.2026 and now the compliance is under process. He prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

5. List on 07.07.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1042 of 2023

Ex Hav Sanjeet Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh, Advocate Shri Narendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Rahul Dev Tripathi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Virat Anand Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. List this case for hearing on amendment application on 23.11.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1247 of 2023 with MA No. 676 of 2026

Ex Cadet Milind Menon

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has already filed amendment application which is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks time to file objection on amendment application.

4. As prayed, two weeks time is granted to the respondents to file objection on amendment application.

5. List on 25.11.2026.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1505 of 2023

Ex Spr Kalika Prasad

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manish Kumar Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manish Kumar Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present. Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present neither physically nor virtually.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he is not inclined to file rejoinder affidavit.

3. Now pleadings are complete.

4. List for physical final hearing on 19.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1183 of 2024

Ex LAC Yogendra Patel

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Advocate

Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks further time to file rejoinder affidavit.

3. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the learned counsel for the applicant to file rejoinder affidavit.

4. List on 19.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 415 of 2026 with MA No. 502 of 2026

Ex Wg. Cdr Chandra Shekhar Azad Gupta

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri SN Dwivedi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri SN Dwivedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Time was granted to the respondents to file objection on delay condonation application which has not been filed.

3. No further time shall be given to the respondents to file objection on delay condonation application.

4. List on 22.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 418 of 2026

Sep Yogendra Kumar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is not present. Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 19.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 420 of 2026 BHM (TA) Sunil Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Narayan Dutt Mishra, Advocate

Shri Amit Kumar Shukla, Advocate Shri Madan Kumar Swarnkar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Narayan Dutt Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments have been received and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 19.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 424 of 2026

Sub Maj & Hony Lt (OSS) Jagdish Kumar Singh(Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Narayan Dutt Mishra, Advocate

Shri Amit Kumar Shukla, Advocate Shri Madan Kumar Swarnkar, Advocate Shri Sawaliya Dwivedi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Narayan Dutt Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments not received and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 24.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 440 of 2026

Ex Nk Arvind Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri AK Srivastava, Advocate Ms. Ambuja Srivastava, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments have been received and seeks some short time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 24.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 453 of 2026

Sgt Krasna Pal Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Ms. Tanya Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 24.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 454 of 2026

Col (TS) Sanjeev Chauhan (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Ms. Tanya Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Somesh Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. Shri Somesh Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present neither physically nor virtually. Legal representative is present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Legal Representative apprised the court that parawise comments have been received by the learned counsel for the respondents on 19.08.2026.

4. In the interest of justice, one more opportunity of four weeks is given to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 24.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 714 of 2023 with MA No. 866 of 2023

Ex Nk Udai Bir Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Original Application is dismissed.

4. Detailed order is placed on separate sheets.

5. Misc. Application(s), pending if any, shall stand disposed of.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1301 of 2023

Ex SGT Umesh Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh, Advocate Shri Rahul Dev Tripathi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Virat Anand Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant filed case law in support of his submission, i.e. Civil Appeal No. 998/2025, Rajumon TM vs. Union of India, decided on 07.05.2025.

3. List for physical final hearing on 01.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 252 of 2024

Leading Seaman Avinash Kumar Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Gopal Dwivedi, Advocate Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Preeti Mala, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. Ms. Preeti Mala, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present. Legal Representative is present.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant pointed that opportunity to file counter affidavit was closed and matter was listed for final hearing.

3. Meanwhile, the respondents have already filed counter affidavit on 06.01.2026 so, in the interest of justice, counter affidavit which has been filed by the respondents is taken on record.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks time to file rejoinder affidavit. As prayed, four weeks time is granted to the learned counsel for the applicant to file rejoinder affidavit.

5. List for orders on 02.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

RA No. 30 of 2024 with MA No. 760 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 828 of 2022

Union of India & Others

Applicants By Legal Practitioner for the Applicants : Shri SN Pandey, Advocate

Versus MWO (HFO) Bhawan Nath Giri (Retd)

Respondent By Legal Practitioner for Respondent : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri SN Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicants-Union of India is not present. Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the respondent is present before the court.

2. In the interest of justice, the case is adjourned for the day.

3. List for hearing on 04.03.2027.

SB