Daily order sheet, C1, 05 Nov 2026 on 5 November 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Ms. Prerna Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Her name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri SN Dwivedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Ms. Prerna Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing. M.A. No. 1289 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is no delay in filing of this Original Application. However, ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application which is rejected as not required.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 1074 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. In this case GMO 2023 has been challenged.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 21.05.2027.

(Maj. Gen. Sanjay Singh) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 2) OA No. 1076 of 2026

Hav Nur Asst Sandeep Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri GS Sikarwar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

3. This original application has been filed for grant of pre mature discharge to the applicant. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

4. Case needs adjudication.

5. Admit.

6. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

7. List on 21.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 3) OA No. 1081 of 2026 with MA No. 1295 of 2026 Ex Sub /Clk (SD) Rajeev Ranjan Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri NM Tiwari, Advocate

Shri Ashish Tripathi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri NM Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing. M.A. No. 1295 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of 07 months and 23 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 1081 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 21.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 4)

OA No. 1093 of 2026 with MA No. 1306 of 2026

Ex Nk Gaurav Kumar Bharduwaj

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Ms. Hemlata, Advocate

Shri Rahul Dev Tripathi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri JN Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Ms. Hemlata, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents raised objection regarding maintainability of the O.A on the ground that the alternate remedy as provided u/s 21 of the AFT Act, 2007, has not been availed by the applicant before approaching this Tribunal, by filing the First Appeal before the respondents.

4. During the course of hearing, ld. Counsel for the applicant conceded that the applicant filed this O.A without exhausting remedies of appeal as provided in the AFT Act.

5. In view of aforesaid, we are of the considered view that this O.A is premature and is liable to be dismissed.

6. Accordingly, the O.A is dismissed at the admission stage itself being pre-mature.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 5)

Ex –A. No. 323 of 2026 with MA 1298 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 21 of 2026

Ex Sgt Umesh Kumar Kushwaha

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Ms. Hemlata, Advocate

Shri Rahul Dev Tripathi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Ms. Hemlata, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri GS Sikarwar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 15.04.2026 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 21 of 2026.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

6. Ld. Counsel for the applicant also filed M.A No. 1298/2026 for condoning the delay in filing of the execution application which is rejected as delay is not application in execution case.

7. Accordingly, M.A No. 1298/2026 stands disposed of.

8. List on 21.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No.37 of 2023 Inre: OA No.683 of 2021 Ex Rect Ram Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Compliance affidavit has already been filed by the respondents on 26.09.2025. Applicant was granted time to file objection. More than one year has already passed but the objection on compliance is not filed by the applicant. Ld. Counsel for the applicant seeks some more time to file objection. Time as prayed is allowed as a matter of last opportunity.

3. List on 05.07.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Sl. No.2)

Ex-A. No. 138 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 922 of 2022 Ex Hav Arvind Kumar Pandey

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. PPO has been issued on 19.10.2026 and payment has also been made to the applicant.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant is not available, so on the basis of PPO which reflects that the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 142 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 524 of 2022

Col Jai Prakash Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In this case, the O.A was decided on 14.10.2022. Four years have already passed, writ petition which was filed by the respondents is duly dismissed on 07.05.2026 but order has been complied with.

5. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

6. List on 05.07.2027.

7. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

8. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 472 of 2024 Inre: TA No. 69 of 2023

Ex MWO Anil Kumar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Advocate

Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. In pursuance of earlier order dated 12.05.2026, ld. Counsel for the applicant submitted that undertaking was sent to the respondents by post which has been received back due to incorrect address. He further stated that in short span to time he will again send the undertaking to the respondents, copy of which has already been received by the Departmental Representative.

3. If the undertaking is received, respondents are directed to comply the order provisionally as directed earlier and file provisional compliance affidavit.

4. List on 05.07.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No.299 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 1324 of 2023

Col Brajesh Dwivedi (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In this case, the O.A was decided on 21.08.2024. Two years have already passed, writ petition which was filed by the respondents is duly dismissed on 27.07.2026 and four months have already passed but order has been complied with.

5. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

6. List on 05.07.2027.

7. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

8. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 300 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 171 of 2024

L/NK Laxman (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Advocate

Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that respondents have approached before the Hon’ble High Court to assail the order of this Tribunal by filing a writ petition which is duly rejected on 11.08.2026 and now they are bound to obey the order of this Tribunal. He seeks some more time to comply the order. Time as prayed is allowed as a last opportunity.

5. It is made clear that if order is not complied with till the next date of listing then coercive action shall be taken against the respondents.

6. List on 05.07.2027.

7. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 301 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 802 of 2024 Nk Naveen Kumar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Advocate

Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Rajesh Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Compliance affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. PPO has been issued on 07.05.2026 and payment has also been made to the applicant.

4. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 303 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 1227 of 2023

Ex L/NK Anil Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Virat Anand Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Departmental Representative submits that being aggrieved by the order of this Bench, Writ Petition No. 7722 of 2026 has been filed before the Hon’ble High Court in which notice has been issued on 03.08.2026 but there is no stay order in favour of the respondents.

5. Consequently, respondents are bound to obey the order in letter and spirit. Since matter is subjudice, respondents are directed to make compliance of the order provisionally subject to final outcome of the Writ Petition filed before the Hon’ble High Court after obtaining an undertaking on affidavit from the applicant to the effect that, in case, any adverse order is passed against him, he would return all the amount, if any, and comply with the order of the Hon’ble High Court passed in Writ Petition.

6. As prayed by learned counsel for the respondents four weeks further time is granted to comply the order provisionally and file provisional compliance affidavit.

7. List on 06.07.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 46 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 32 of 2025

Nb Sub Rajeev Sharma (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Kavita Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Kavita Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents agrees that respondents are bound to comply the order and one more opportunity be granted. She prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit failing which respondents shall deposit cost of Rs. 10,000/- in the Registry which shall be remitted to the applicant.

5. It is made clear that if order is not complied with by the next date of listing, coercive action shall be taken against the respondents.

6. List on 06.07.2027.

7. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 149 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 376 of 2024

Ex Nk Raj Kumar Dubey

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant :Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh Chauhan, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that two years have already passed but the order has not been complied with by the respondents. He further stated that Writ Petition No. 3815 of 2026 has been filed assailing the order of this Tribunal before the Hon’ble High Court which is still pending but there is no stay order in favour of the respondents.

5. In these circumstances, respondents are directed to make compliance of the order provisionally subject to final outcome of the Writ Petition filed before the Hon’ble High Court after obtaining an undertaking on affidavit from the applicant to the effect that, in case, any adverse order is passed against him, he would return all the amount, if any, and comply with the order of the Hon’ble High Court passed in Writ Petition.

6. As prayed by learned counsel for the respondents four weeks further time is granted to comply the order provisionally and file provisional compliance affidavit.

7. List on 06.07.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 150 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 617 of 2022

Ex Sep Roshan Ali Ansari

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri VP Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that he has no instructions in the matter.

5. Departmental Representative submits that writ petition is supposed to be filed assailing the order of this Bench before the Hon’ble High Court but till today no writ petition is filed.

6. Respondents’ counsel prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit till the next date failing which respondents shall deposit cost of Rs. 10,000/- in the Registry which shall be remitted to the applicant.

7. List on 06.07.2027.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 151 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 807 of 2024

Col. Harsh Vardhan Gupta (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh Chauhan, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that order has been complied with. PPO has also been issued on 30.10.2026 and payment will be done shortly.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant may file objection, if any, till the next date of listing.

4. List on 15.01.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 817 of 2024 MA No. 916 of 2024

Ex Sep Kirpa Shanker Tiwari

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh, Advocate

Shri Narendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Virat Anand Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant prays for adjournment of the case. As prayed, the case is adjourned.

3. List for hearing on admission on 13.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1070 of 2024

MCPO LOG (SC) II Shiv Kumar Yadav (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Devendra Kumar, Advocate

Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri DK Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri DK Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he is not inclined to file rejoinder affidavit.

3. Now pleadings are complete.

4. List for physical final hearing on 26.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 425 of 2025

Swr Dipesh Sarkar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri SN Singh Gaherwar, Advocate Shri Ajit Singh Gaherwar, Advocate Ms. Preeti Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri SN Singh Gaherwar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has filed rejoinder affidavit which is taken on record.

3. Now pleadings are complete.

4. List for physical final hearing on 26.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 472 of 2025 with MA No. 575 of 2025

Ex Rifleman Bharat Bahadur Thapa

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KKS Bisht, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Virat Anand Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri KKS Bisht, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present before the court.

2. Due to illness, Shri KKS Bisht, learned counsel for the applicant is unable to attend the court.

3. As prayed, the case is adjourned for the day.

4. List on 18.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 494 of 2025

Nk Radha Krishnan C (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RKS Chauhan, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri RKS Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents has filed counter affidavit which is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file rejoinder affidavit.

4. List on 18.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 741 of 2025 Ex Sub Rajendra Singh Baghel

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that counter affidavit is sent for vetting.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 19.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 742 of 2025

Ex Sgt Manoj Kumar Srivastava

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Abhay Kant Upadhyay, Advocate Shri Madan Pal Vats, Advocate Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that rejoinder affidavit is ready and he will file in the Registry within a week after serving its copy to the learned counsel for the respondents.

3. As prayed by the learned counsel for the applicant, list on 01.03.2027 for physical final hearing.

4. List on 01.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 750 of 2025

Ex Sub (Clk/SD) Suresh Kumar Pal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Singh, Advocate

Shri Ankur Rawat, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Deepti Prasad Bajpai, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Ld. Counsel for the parties are not present. However, Legal Representative is present for the respondents.

2. Today, this case is listed for filing of rejoinder affidavit which has not been filed by the applicant.

3. Last opportunity of four weeks is granted to the applicant to file rejoinder affidavit.

4. List on 19.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 462 of 2026

WO Sanjay Kumar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Shri Ramesh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode. Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present neither physically nor virtually.

2. Legal Representative submitted that parawise comments have already been given to the learned counsel for the respondents on 20.08.2026.

3. In the circumstances, last opportunity is given to the learned counsel for the respondents to file counter affidavit.

4. List on 19.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 465 of 2026

Sub Maj (Store Keeper Technical) Ravindra Singh (Retd) Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KKS Bisht, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Virat Anand Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri KKS Bisht, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that parawise comments have not received and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 19.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

TA No. 29 of 2024

JWO Pramod Kumar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri AK Chaudhary, Advocate

Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Legal Representative apprised the court that parawise comments have been received and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 19.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 23 of 2024

Ex Sep Raj Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Shri Suresh Kumar Saini, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Matter is pending before the Larger Bench, whether the applicant is entitled for the service element of the disability pension or not.

3. List on 22.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 790 of 2024 MWO Anil Kumar Pandey(Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh, Advocate

Shri Narendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Jainendra Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Original Application is allowed.

4. Detailed order is placed on separate sheets.

5. Misc. Application(s), pending if any, shall stand disposed of.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1013 of 2024

Ris (ADT) Prabha Shankar Mishra

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Jainendra Pandey, Advocate

Shri Diwakar Mishra, Advocate Ms. Anjani Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Jainendra Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. It was directed to the respondents to produce record with regard to comparative merit but the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that concerned record is not sent by the RVC Records.

3. In the circumstances, OIC RVC Records is directed to produce original record including comparative merit list otherwise he will appear virtually before the court on the next date fixed to explain the reasons for non producing of original record of the applicant.

4. List for physical hearing on 25.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 13 of 2025

Ex Nk Ved Prakash Upadhyay

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manish Kumar Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manish Kumar Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks some more time to argue the case because he is not well today. As prayed, the case is adjourned for the day.

3. List for physical hearing on 25.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

TA No. 48 of 2023

Ex Sgt Misra Madan Mohan

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Advocate Shri Krishan Kumar Singh, Advocate Shri Indra Mani Tripathi, Advocate Shri Amit Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Amit Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has already filed written submission regarding chronology of the case which is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that substitution application alongwith abatement application are pending for hearing. He further submitted that during the pendency of this petition, the ex-serviceman was reported to be no more, date of death 11.10.2001.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that original applicant filed Writ Petition No. 31037/2001 before the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court on 16.08.2001 and during the pendency of the Writ Petition, the original applicant died leaving behind widow and two minor children. He further submitted that during the pendency of the Writ Petition before the Hon’ble High Court, counter affidavit has been filed by the union of India which is available on record. The Hon’ble High Court transferred the Writ Petition to Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) Allahabad vide order dated 23.03.2010 and it was pending before the CAT. The CAT after disposing M.A. No. 1410/2023, returned the entire record to the Hon’ble High Court vide order dated 11.05.2023. Thereafter, in the year 2023, the Writ Petition was transferred to this Tribunal.

5. The original applicant’s wife moved substitution application on 24.07.2006 after a delay of more than five years but substitution application was not considered by the Hon’ble High Court and whole case was transferred to the CAT, but the substitution application is still pending and substitution application was not decided by the CAT as well as by the Hon’ble High Court.

6. The original applicant’s wife (Smt. Ranivasi Mishra) moved fresh substitution application alongwith application for setting aside abatement before this Tribunal on 06.08.2024 to which objection has been filed by the respondents and reply has been filed on behalf of the applicant.

7. Heard learned counsel for the parties on substitution application and application for setting aside abatement and perused the record.

8. In the interest of justice and the applicant (Smt Ranivasi Mishra) being wife of the applicant, abatement is set aside and substitution application is hereby allowed. Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to carry out amendment in the Transferred Application within two weeks. After carrying out substitution, learned counsel for the applicant is given four weeks time to file rejoinder affidavit.

9. It is also directed that for identity of the applicant (Smt Ranivasi Mishra), learned counsel for the applicant is directed to submit proof of applicant’s identity such as PAN & Aadhar card.

10. List this case for order on 09.02.2027.

SB