Allahabad High Court

WRIC/47490/2011 of ZANULLAH AND AN.R Vs STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS on 11 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 47490 of 2011 Petitioner :- Zanullah And An.R Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar,Vijay Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arvind Kumar,Ashish Kumar Srivastava,B.P. Pandey,Dhananjay Awasthi,Vijay Kumar Rai Hon'ble

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 47490 of 2011 Petitioner :- Zanullah And An.R Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar,Vijay Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arvind Kumar,Ashish Kumar Srivastava,B.P. Pandey,Dhananjay Awasthi,Vijay Kumar Rai Hon'ble Munishwar Nath Bhandari,Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J. Sri Vijay Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioners has sent an adjournment slip without specifying the ground for adjournment. Mrs. Subhash Rathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Ashish Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for Gorakhpur Development Authority are present. The writ petition could have been adjourned but finding that during the pendency of the writ petition not only award was passed but possession of land was also taken. In none of the connected petitions award has been challenged rather what has been challenged is the order dated 2.5.2011. Despite award dated 28.6.2011 and possession of land, no challenge to it has been made and in the light of the aforesaid nothing would survive in the petition as much water has flown after the impugned order. Accordingly, we do not find any purpose to adjourn the writ petition rather in the facts and circumstances given in the connected petitions, the writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to seek revival of the writ petition by making an application, if any cause survives. Order Date :- 8.9.2021 Kuldeep (Anil Kumar Ojha, J.) (Munishwar Nath Bhandari, A.C.J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead