Allahabad High Court

NA529/6002/2026 of ISMAIL Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 4 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 6002 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 6002 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned to expedite the proceedings of Case No. 5072 of 2008 (New No. 1608 of 2011) (State vs. Shaheed and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 24 of 2008, under Sections 147, 148, 427, 336, 447, 34 IPC and Section 7 of CRLA Act, Police Station Chhatta, District Agra, pending before the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Agra, within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that charge sheet has been filed on 7.5.2008 against applicant and other five persons, and thereafter, court concerned took cognizance on 21.5.2009. The applicant is a retired government servant who has been regularly and diligently appearing before the trial court on each and every date fixed. The trial is pending since 2009, i.e. more than 16 years. Looking to the aforesaid circumstances, it is directed that trial pending before the concerned court be concluded expeditiously, as early as possible, preferably, within one and half years, from the date of filing of certified copy of this order, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment. The application is disposed of. November 5, 2026 Brijesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Kumar Vishvakarma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Ismail .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead