Allahabad High Court

CRLP/26079/2026 of MANOJ KUMAR SARVESH KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 1 November 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 26079 of 2026 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J. 1. Heard Mr. Tarun Jha, the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned A.G.A. for State-respondents 1, 2 and 3. 2. Perused the record. 3.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 26079 of 2026

Court No. - 47

HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J.

HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Mr. Tarun Jha, the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned A.G.A. for State-respondents 1, 2 and 3.

2. Perused the record.

3. Petitioners- Majoj Kumar Sarvesh Kumar has approached this Court by means of present Criminal Misc. Writ Petition challenging the FIR dated 03.05.2026 lodged by first informant-respondent-4, Smt. Anjana Kumari and registered as Case Crime No. 0099 of 2026, under Sections 296, 351(3) BNS, Police Station- Line Par, District- Firozabad.

4. On the matter being taken up, the learned AGA for State- respondents submits that after completion of statutory investigation of aforementioned case crime number, Investigating Officer has forwarded the charge-sheet/police report dated 30.05.2026 in terms of Section 193(3) BNSS. It is further submitted by the learned AGA that cognizance has also been taken upon aforementioned charge-sheet vide cognizance taking order dated 17.07.2026 passed by jurisdictional magistrate.

5. In view of above and also the law laid down by Supreme Court in Pradnya Pranjal Kulkarni Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1948, this writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Tarun Jha Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Manoj Kumar Sarvesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 2, 2026 Dhirendra/ CRLP No. 26079 of 2026 2 (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead