Allahabad High Court
WRIC/41977/2026 of JAVITRI DEVI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 1 November 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 41977 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jitendra Narain Rai, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the state-respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:-
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 41977 of 2026
Court No. - 37
HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jitendra Narain Rai, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the state-respondents.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Tehsildar, Tehsil- Koraon, District- Prayagraj/respondent no.2 to decide the Mutation Application No. T202602030905307 (Sangram Vs. Khurkhundi) pending before him, within stipulated period."
3. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that mutation proceeding is pending before respondent no.2/Tehsildar since long. He placed the order-sheet of the pending proceeding which is annexed as Annexure No.5 to the writ petition in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding expeditiously.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid proceedings to its logical conclusion, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 3 months, from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before the authority concerned, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, in accordance with law. November 2, 2026 C.Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhiraj Singh, Hemwati Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Javitri Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad