Allahabad High Court
NA528/38692/2026 of KM SUMAN SONKAR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 1 November 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 38692 of 2026 Court No. - 80 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anil Kumar Ojha, learned A.G.A. for the State, Sri Ravi Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 38692 of 2026
Court No. - 80
HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anil Kumar Ojha, learned A.G.A. for the State, Sri Ravi Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the record.
2. The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the prayer to quash the Charge Sheet dated 08.11.2020, cognizance/summoning order dated 07.12.2020 and the entire proceedings of S.T. No.1305 of 2020 (State Vs. Shiv Sonkar and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 443 of 2020, under Sections 376, 417 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Meja, District Prayagraj, pending in the Court of A.C.J.M.-10, District - Allahabad.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant and opposite party no. 2 have entered into a compromise and they have amicably settled their dispute outside the court and no dispute is pending between them, therefore, does not want to get adjudication of alleged criminal act and prayed that the aforesaid criminal case may be quashed. He further submits that the applicant shall file compromise deed before the learned trial court for verification.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State submit that they have no objection if the parties approach trial court to file compromise deed in the given circumstances.
5. Whether the parties have entered into compromise, can best be Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Singh, Sunil Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ravi Pratap Narayan Singh Km Suman Sonkar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
adjudicated by the trial court. As such, the parties may appear before the trial court and file the compromise deed entered into between the parties within 30 days, which shall be verified by the trial court. The trial court shall place the original compromise deed in its record.
6. No compromise shall be entertained by the trial court if the informant/victim and accused are not signatories and appear before the court of its verification. In case of exigency, the trial court shall apply its mind and pass appropriate order.
7. For a period of two months, the proceedings of the trial court shall be kept in abeyance, if the compromise is filed and verified within stipulated period, otherwise, the trial court shall continue with the trial in accordance with law.
8. All the parties, who files compromise deed and get it verified shall then file a fresh application invoking inherent power of this Court to quash the criminal proceeding.
9. In view of above, the application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. is accordingly disposed of. November 2, 2026 Rmk. NA528 No. 38692 of 2026 2
(Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad