Allahabad High Court
HABC/1552/2026 of ARTI VERMA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 1 November 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 1552 of 2026 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Present Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 1552 of 2026
Court No. - 72
HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. Present Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by petitioners with the prayer to direct the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to produce the corpus (Arti Verma) i.e. petitioner no.1 before this Court forthwith illegally detained by the respondent no.4-Seva Ram (father).
3. In compliance of order dated 26.10.2026, corpus has been produced by the respondent nos. 2 and 3 and submitted that petitioner no.1 and petitioner petitioner no.2 were living in live in relationship, but at present she was in custody of respondent no.4-father.
4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners that corpus-petitioner no.1 does not want to live with her father and she want to live the petitioner no.2. Petitioner no.2 and corpus were living in live in relation.
5. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer as aforesaid and submitted that both cannot live in relationship without solemnization of legal marriage between them and corpus cannot be handed over to petitioner no.2. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Najakat Ali, Rehana Siddique Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Arti Verma And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. Considering the fact and circumstances of the case and argument raised by the learned counsel for the parties, it is apparent from the record that since corpus is major and have right to live anywhere at her own free will and at present corpus is not in illegal custody, as she is living with her parents, as such, present petition having no force and does not require any interference.
7. With the above observation, the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is disposed of. November 2, 2026 T.S. HABC No. 1552 of 2026 2 (Deepak Verma,J.) Digitally signed by :- TRIBHUWAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad