Allahabad High Court
WRIC/44272/2026 of SMT. NAUSHABA KHATOON Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 1 November 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 44272 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. By means of the present petition filed under Article 226 of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 44272 of 2026
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. By means of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed for a direction the respondent No.4 to pay the outstanding dues for the work that she has carried out under the contract entered with the local body.
3. It is contended that Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Badhani Chafa, District Siddharth Nagar vide its reply dated 6.8.2026 on IGRS portal has admitted the claim of the petitioner and informed the petitioner the payment shall be made soon.
4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.4 to look into and consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law.
5. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Badhani Chafa, District Siddharth Nagar/respondent no.4 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner raised on IGRS Portal and decide the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
6. Further, in the event any amount is found due to the petitioner after the decision is taken by the authority, the same shall be paid within a period Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Babu, Vinay Kumar Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Naushaba Khatoon .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
of two weeks, failing which the petitioner shall be entitled to interest at the rate of 8% from the date the amount became initially due till the date of actual payment. November 2, 2026 Kuldeep WRIC No. 44272 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad