Allahabad High Court
WRIC/32234/2026 of M/S MANOJ TRADERS Vs STATE OF UP AND 9 OTHERS on 1 November 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32234 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Sanjay Kumar Om, learned counsel for the Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam (Rural). 2. By means of this petition filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 32234 of 2026
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Sanjay Kumar Om, learned counsel for the Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam (Rural).
2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief as substantial relief: "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.6/Chief Engineer (Karya Kshetra), Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam (Rural), Kanpur and respondent no.9/Executive Engineer (Rural), Nirman Khand (Electrical/Mechanical), Panki Canal Raw Water Intake Compound, Armapur, Kalpi Road, Kanpur to pay/release the petitioner's firm admitted dues of Rs. 11,29,686/- (with interest) as evident from the letter dated 25.05.2026 mentioned at serial nos.17 to 24 at internal page no. 2 and serial nos.15 to 17 at internal page no.3 (Annexure No.3 at Page No. 25 to the writ petition) within a reasonable period to be determined by the Hon'ble Court"
3. It transpires from the records that the petitioner has already represented the matter to the respondent no. 4 vide representation dated 25.05.2026 which is still pending consideration.
4. Learned counsel for the Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam (Rural) submits that he has no objection in the event this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 4 to look into and consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Jaiswal, Shaikh Mohd Mujib Ur Rahman Counsel for Respondent(s) : Vimlesh Kumar Rai, C.S.C., Sanjay Kumar Om, Suresh Singh M/S Manoj Traders .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 9 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that respondent No.4 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner raised in his representation and decide the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
6. Further, in the event any amount is found due to the petitioner after the decision is taken by the authority, the same shall be paid within a period of two weeks, failing which the petitioner shall be entitled to interest at the rate of 8% from the date the amount became initially due till the date of actual payment. November 2, 2026 Lbm/- WRIC No. 32234 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad