Allahabad High Court
WRIC/44284/2026 of TAHJEEBUNNEESHA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS on 1 November 2026
OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 44284 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard Ms. Monu Singh, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 44284 of 2026
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Ms. Monu Singh, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the act and conduct of the private respondent in interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioner over plot No.456 situate at village Paliyamafi, Pargana Mahul, Tehsil Pholpur District Azamgarh.
3. From perusal of the record, it appears that the petitioner has already instituted a civil suit against the private respondent seeking permanent prohibitory injunction owing the land in question.
4. In our considered view, as the petitioner has already approached the court of competent jurisdiction, he should pray for interim injunction against the private respondent and in case the petitioner has already moved an interim injunction application, he should move an urgency application for disposal of the interim injunction application. In the event such an application is moved within two weeks from today, the interim injunction application shall be considered and disposed of within a period next two months. We make it clear that the police administration, district administration and revenue authorities should not interfere in the private
Versus
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Tahjeebunneesha .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)
dispute between the parties unless and until there is an emergent situation of law and order.
5. Subject to the aforesaid, the writ petition is consigned to record. November 2, 2026 Kuldeep WRIC No. 44284 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad