Allahabad High Court
WRIC/44106/2026 of DHARMENDRA GARG Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 1 November 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 44106 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The petitioner before this Court is praying for a direction to
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 44106 of 2026
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. The petitioner before this Court is praying for a direction to respondent No. 2 and police authorities not to interfere with the day to day functioning of the petitioner and the office bearers of the Committee of Management of Krishna Kumar Saraswati Vidya Mandir, Junior High School, Shikapur, Bulandshahar, of which the petitioner is the Manager.
3. From perusal of the record, it appears that the petitioner has already instituted a civil suit against the private respondents seeking permanent prohibitory injunction concerning the property in question.
4. In our considered view, as the petitioner has already approached the court of competent jurisdiction, he should seek interim injunction against the private respondents and in case the petitioner has already moved an interim injunction application, he should move an urgency application for disposal of the interim injunction application. In the event such an application is moved within two weeks from today, the interim injunction application shall be considered and disposed of within a period next two months. We make it clear that the police authorities should not interfere in the private dispute between the parties unless and until there is an emergent situation of law and order.
5. Subject to the aforesaid, the writ petition is consigned to record. November 2, 2026 Sachin Mishra Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Verma, Mahesh Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Dharmendra Garg .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad