Allahabad High Court
NABAIL/11187/2026 of ARJUN SAV Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 1 November 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 11187 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State. 2. The present application has been filed on behalf of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 11187 of 2026
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
2. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime/ F.I.R. No.705 of 2026, under Sections 8/20/27A/29/60 of N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station Robertsganj, District Sonbhadra, with a prayer to grant him anticipatory bail.
3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this application and move an appropriate application seeking regular bail before the concerned Court. He prays that a direction may be given to the concerned Court to decide the bail application expeditiously.
4. Learned AGA has no objection to the said prayer.
5. On the prayer made, it is provided that in case the applicant appears before the concerned court and applies for bail within three weeks from today, his application for bail shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law.
6. However, for a period of three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravish Chandra Srivastava, Vijay Kumar Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Arjun Sav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
7. With these observations, the application is disposed of.
8. It is made clear that no further time shall be granted to comply with this order. November 2, 2026 Radhika NABAIL No. 11187 of 2026 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad