Allahabad High Court
NA528/45228/2026 of ASHOK AND 3 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 1 November 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 45228 of 2026 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State. 2. The present application has been filed for seeking quashing of charge- sheet dated
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 45228 of 2026
Court No. - 76
HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
2. The present application has been filed for seeking quashing of charge- sheet dated 07.01.2026, cognizance/summoning order dated 28.01.2026 and the entire proceeding of Case No.57 of 2026 (State Vs. Ashok and others), arising out of Case Crime No.449 of 2025, under sections 115(2), 117(2), 352, 351(3) of BNS, P.S. Baksa, District- Jaunpur, pending in the court of learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) First, District Jaunpur.
3. On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and charge-sheet, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along with charge-sheet and entire criminal proceedings of the said case, can be set aside.
4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.
5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection.
6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kailash Nath Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ashok And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants surrender before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. and Another, reported in 2021 (10) SCC 773.
7. However, it is made clear that till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants herein in pursuance of aforesaid case. November 2, 2026 Ashish/- NA528 No. 45228 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad