Allahabad High Court

SAPL/113/2024 of VINOD SINGH AND OTHERS Vs SRI NEERAJ SINGH AND ANOTHER on 5 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 113 of 2024 Appellant :- Vinod Singh And Others Respondent :- Sri Neeraj Singh And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Gyanendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Satish Kumar Misra,Ashutosh Ojha Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. This matter was heard by this Court on

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Court No. - 21 Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 113 of 2024 Appellant :- Vinod Singh And Others Respondent :- Sri Neeraj Singh And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Gyanendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Satish Kumar Misra,Ashutosh Ojha Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. This matter was heard by this Court on 25.05.2024 and the following order was passed, which reads as under:- "Heard Shri Gyanendra Singh, learned counsel for the appellants. Shri Ashutosh Ojha, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents and has also filed an application along with his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the appellants submits that he requires some more time to complete his arguments. Put up on Monday i.e. 27.05.2024 for further hearing. Office to reflect the name of Shri Ashutosh Ojha as counsel for the respondents when the case is next listed." Today, the matter was listed on the request of learned counsel for the appellants, however, in the first round, learned counsel for the appellants was not present. Giving an opportunity, the matter was directed to be placed in the post lunch session. Even then when the case was taken up only the learned counsel for the respondent was present, however, learned counsel for the appellants Shri Gyanendra Singh was not present. In the aforesaid circumstances, when sufficient time was devoted on the arguments on 25.05.2024 and on request, it was listed today on 27.05.2024, yet the learned counsel for the appellants did not appear is not appreciable, hence, the Court has no option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Consigned to record. Order Date :- 27.5.2024 Rakesh/- Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead