Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2032/2026 of K. Veeranjaneyulu Vs Sri. Sasi Bhushan Kumar, I.A.S. on 9 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE 10 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2032/2026 Between: 1. K. VEERANJANEYULU, S/O, K. RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1 KUMMARA PURUGU PALEM NORTH, MOGALTHUR MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 1. SRI SASI
APHC010274992026
IN THE
TUESDAY, T
THE HONOURAB
CONT
Between:
1. K. VEERANJANEYUL
YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1
KUMMARA PURUGU
WEST GODAVARI DI
1. SRI SASI BHUSHAN
PANCHAYAT RAJ A
A.P. SECRETARIAT
DISTRICT - 522238
2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMA
AND
PLANNING
VELAGAPUDI, AMAR
3. SRI Z RAMESH, SUP
DEPARTMENT, ELUR
4. SRI S V RAMANA, EX
WEST GODAVARI DI
Petition under Section
that in the circumstances s
be pleased to may be plea
by the Respondents in n
C.C.N
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THE 10th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2026
PRESENT
BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPA
TEMPT CASE NO: 2032/2026
LU, S/O, K. RAMA RAO, AGED A
1-69, KANDULAPATI VARI MERAKA
U PALEM NORTH, MOGALTHUR
STRICT
...PE
AND
N KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SEC
AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPA
AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI,
AR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT,
A.P
SECRETAR
RAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238
PERINTENDING ENGINEER, PANCHA
RU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 534
XECUTIVE ENGINEER, PIU DIVISION
STRICT - 534001
...CONTE
ns 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 19
tated in the affidavit file herein the High ased to take cognizance of the offence non-compliance of the direction issued RC,J
NO.2032 OF 2026
H
ATI
ABOUT 46
VILLAGE,
MANDAL,
TITIONER
CRETARY,
ARTMENT,
GUNTUR
FINANCE
RIAT
AT
AYAT RAJ
N, ELURU,
MNOR(S):
971 praying
Court may
committed
d by this
RC,J
C.C.NO.2032 OF 2026
Honourable Court and non-implementation of the Order, dt.27-11-2025 in W.P.No.29153/2025 under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act and punish the Respondents with appropriate sentence and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead the Proposed Respondent No.5 herein as Party Respondent No.5 in C.C.No.2032/2026 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.CHERUVU CHAITANYA BHARGAVA SARMA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.NAGARAJU NAGURU
2.RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Sri Cheruvu Chaitanya, learned counsel for petitioner, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, has duly been complied with and hence this Contempt Case may be closed.
2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for petitioner, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 10TH November, 2026
RR