Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/21716/2025 of THE DOMMERU PACS Vs THE REGIONAL MANAGER on 4 November 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 5th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 21716/2025 Between: 1. THE DOMMERU PACS, REP. BY IT'S CHAIRPERSON GARAPATI SRI VENKETA KRISHNA RAMARAO S/O
APHC010417532025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 5th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 21716/2025
Between:
1. THE DOMMERU PACS, REP. BY IT'S CHAIRPERSON GARAPATI SRI
VENKETA KRISHNA RAMARAO S/O VENAKTA SUBRAHMANYAM, AGED 55 YRS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O DOMMERU VILLAGE, THALLAPUDI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH STATE
2. THE ARIKIREVULA P.A.C.S., REP.BY IT'S CHAIRPERSON CHAVA
RAMAKRISHNA SRINIVASARAO S/O PEDARATTAYYA, AGED 59
YRS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, ARIKIREVULA VILLAGE, KOWUR
MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE
3. THE KOVVURU P.A.C.S., REP. BY ITS CHAIRPERSON KANTAMANI
RAMAKRISHNA RAO S/O VENAKTA SUBBA RAO AGED 57 YRS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O KOVVURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE
4. THE PASIVEDALA L.S.C.S, REP.BY IT'S CHAIRPERSON GARAPATI
RAMACHANDRA
RAO S/O PRAKASHAM, AGED 59 YRS,
OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O PASIVEDALA VILLAGE, KOVVURU
MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE
5. THE
MALAKAPALLI
L.S.C.S.,
REP.
BY
IT'S
CHAIRPERSON
JONNALAGADDA VENKATA SUBBARAYA CHOWDARI S/O TATALU, AGED 64 YRS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O MALAKAPALLI VILLAGE, KOVVURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH STATE
6. THE KAPAVARAM P.A.C.S., REP. BY IT'S CHAIRPERSON SUNKARA
SATTIBABU S/O KRISHNA, AGED 37 YRS, OCC.AGRICULTURE
R/O KAPAVARAM VILLAGE, KOVVURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE
7. THE ANNADEVARAPETA L.S.C.S, REP.BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PAPOLU SRINIVASARAO S/O SESHARAO AGED. 59
YEARS, R/O DUDDUKURU VILLAGE, DEVARAPALLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
8. THE THADIPUDI L.S.C.S, REP BY ITS REP. BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER BORRA RAMACHANDRAM S/O SUBBA RAO AGED 59
YEARS, R/O THADIPUDI VILLAGE, THALLAPUDI MANDAL, EAST
GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE
REGIONAL
MANAGER,
NATIONAL
AGRICULTURAL
INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., UNITED INDIA INSURANCE TOWERS
BASHEERBAGH,HYDERABAD
2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
COOP CENTRAL BANK ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in deducting the cropinsurance premium from the crop loans of the petitioners/members released and to be released to the members of the petitioners at the rate of 1percent to 12.5percent towards crop insurance premium in the khariff and rabbi seasons 2025 to 2026 is as i illegal, arbitrary, violation of provisions of constitution of India, contract Act and declare the same as optional and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents not to deduct any crop insurance premium from the Loans released and to be released from the petitioners and
Members of petitioners in Khariff and rabbi seasons 2025 to 2026, pending disposal of above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. B PARAMESEWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SURAGANI VIJAYA KUMAR
2. P MOHAN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 21716 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 05.11.2026 BSM/KSK
WRIT PETITION NO: 21716 of 2025 Date: 05.11.2026
BSM/KSK