Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/13967/2019 of Pallapothu Prasad, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 4 November 2026
LOK-ADALAT HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI, NELAPADU GUNTUR DISTRICT (Under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act) :QUORUM: Hon’ble Sri Justice D.V.S.S.Somayajulu Judge, High Court of Andhra Pradesh (Chairman) Sri K.Ravi Kiran Kumar, Advocate, High
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK-ADALAT
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI, NELAPADU GUNTUR DISTRICT
(Under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act)
:QUORUM:
Hon’ble Sri Justice D.V.S.S.Somayajulu Judge, High Court of Andhra Pradesh (Chairman)
Sri K.Ravi Kiran Kumar, Advocate, High Court of Andhra Pradesh (Member) W.P.No. 13967 of 2019
Petitioner(s) : Pallapothu Prasad S/o Venkateswarlu, age 45 years R/o Ponnaluru Village and Mandal, Prakasam District
2. Gaddam Murali, S/o Venkaiah, Age 46 years, R/o Ponnaluru Village and Mandal, Prakasam District
Respondent(s) : State of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Principal Secretary Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Guntur District.
2. The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise and Director, APSBCL, 88-2B, Kollafarum Road, SER Centre, Prasadampadu Currency Nagar, Vijayawada Andhra Pradesh 521108.
3. The Joint Collector, Ongole, Prakasam District.
4. The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition And Excise, Ongole, Prakasam District.
5. The Superintendent of Prohibition and Excise, Markapur, Prakasam District.
6. The Station House Officer, Prohibition and Excise Station, Kandukur, Prakasam District.
7. Lellapalli Achyuta Kumar, S/o Kotilingaiah, aged 40 years, Ponnaluru Village and Mandal, Prakasam District Counsel for the Petitioner(s) : Smt. Marella Radha Counsel for the Respondent(s) : G.P. for Prohibition and Excise
A W A R D Dated: 12.03.2022
The petitioner filed this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2 to 6th respondents in allotting shop Serial No.183 in favour of 7th respondent for taking lease of the premises for an amount of Rs.27,000/- per month rent in auction dated 23.08.2019, whereas the petitioners quoted below Rs.20,000/- per month and rejecting the petitioners bid as illegal arbitrary and in violation of Article 14, 19 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and causing loss of revenue to the Government and consequently set aside the allotment of shop No.183 for the premises granted in favour of the 7th respondent in auction dated 23.08.2019 issued by the 2nd to 6th respondents.
During the course of deliberation, both the learned counsel for the parties submit that in view of the subsequent developments, the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication; the Writ Petition has become infructuous and the Writ Petition can be closed as such.
In view of the above terms, an award is passed, closing the Writ Petition as infructuous, with the consent of both counsel before the National Lok Adalat Bench.
Petitioner (s) Counsel for the petitioner (s)
Respondent (s) Counsel for the respondent(s)
The award/order on the above mentioned terms of settlement has been passed this the 12th day of March, 2022, At Amaravati, which has been duly signed by the parties and their counsel in our presence.
Chairman Member
(Seal of the Committee)