Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/32366/2026 of Yakkali Narendra (Student) Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 4 November 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 5th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32366/2026 Between: 1. YAKKALI NARENDRA (STUDENT), REP. BY IT IS FATHER YAKKALI MALLIKARJUNA RAO, S/O Y.NASARAIAH,
APHC010590922026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 5th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 32366/2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. YAKKALI NARENDRA (STUDENT), REP. BY IT IS FATHER YAKKALI MALLIKARJUNA RAO, S/O Y.NASARAIAH, AGED 54 YEARS, OCCUPATION AGRICULTURE COOLIE, R/O 10-498, MARKAPUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL G.V RAMANA VEEDHI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523316
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, E B C WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522238
2. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522238
3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, ECONOMICALLY BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SRI VISHNU TOWERS, KRISHNAVENI SCHOOL ROAD, PORANKI (V), PENAMALURU (M), VIJAYAWADAKRISHNA DISTRICT. 521137
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing financial assistance of Rs1000000 Ten Lakhs to the son of the petitioner Yakkali Narendra as per GO Ms No 29 dated 27082016 despite sanction of funds by the Government under Application IDNo OV2018119144 as illegal arbitrary violation of principles of natural justice and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to release financial assistance of Rs1000000 Ten Lalchs to the son of the petitioner Yaldcali Narendra forthwith under Application IDNo 02018119144 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to release financial assistance of Rs.10,00,000/- (Ten Lakhs)under N.T.R. VideshiVidhyadharana Scheme to the son of the petitioner Yakkali Narendra forthwith under Application ID.No. OV2018119144 pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRIDHAR TUMMALAPUDI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
The Court made the following order: The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondents in not releasing the financial assistance of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only), to the son of the petitioner (Application I.D.No.OV2018119144) under Overseas Scholarship scheme, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. The petitioner’s son by name Yakkali Narendra, applied for the Scholarship under Videshi Vidyadevena, to pursue his studies in abroad vide Application ID No.OV2018119144, as he was selected to pursue his Master’s Course. On such application, he was selected for the Videshi Vidyadevena Scholarship and he would get a financial assistance of Rs.10,00,000/- to pursue higher studies abroad, as per the sanction of funds by the Government vide G.O.Rt No.174 dated 07.12.2017, read with G.O.Ms.No.29 dated 27.08.2016. Inspite of selecting as an eligible candidate for the said scholarship, the respondents did not release the financial assistance of Rs.10,00,000/- to the petitioner’s son. Hence, the present Writ Petition is filed.
3. The learned Government Pleader representing respondent No.3 submits that the application of the Petitioner would be considered and amounts would be sanctioned, if the son of the petitioner is within the conditions specified, for release of the amounts.
4. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of, with the following directions:-
(i) The Respondents are directed to examine the claim of the son of Petitioner within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(ii) In the event, the claim of the son of the petitioner is held to be in order, the Respondents are directed to release the amounts to him within a further period of eight (08) weeks. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:- 05.11.2026 BSM
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO:32366 of 2026
Dt: 05.11.2026
BSM