Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/23714/2025 of THE KALAVALAPALLI PACS Vs THE REGIONAL MANAGER on 4 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 5th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23714/2025 Between: 1. THE KALAVALAPALLI PACS, REP.BY ITS CHAIR PERSON A.SITHARAMANJANEYULU S/O SATYANARAYANA AGED

APHC010448452025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 5th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 23714/2025

Between:

1. THE KALAVALAPALLI PACS, REP.BY ITS CHAIR PERSON

A.SITHARAMANJANEYULU S/O SATYANARAYANA AGED 61 YRS, KALAVALAPALLI CHAGALLU MANDAL E.G. DISTRICT

2. THE CHIKKALA P.A.C.S, REP BY ITS CHAIR PERSON Y.ABBULU

S/O RAJARAO AGED 63 YRS.CHIKKALA CHAGALLU MANDAL

E.G. DISTRICT

3. THE

KOTTAPATTISEEMA

P.A.C.S,

THE

KOTTAPATTISEEMA

P.A.C.S REP BY CHAIR PERSON SHAIK. NAZEER S/O KHASIM

AGED 51Y. DHAVILESWARAM RAJAHMUNDRY RURAL MANDAL

EAST GODAVARI DISTRIC

4. THE

GUTALA

P.A.C.S.,

REP

BY

CHAIR

PERSON

A.V.V.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY S/O NARASIMHA MURTHY.

AGED 58 YRS, GUTALA POLA VARAM MANDAL ELURU DISTRICT

5. THE

UNAGATIA

L.S.C.S.,

REP

BY

CHAIR

PERSON

B.SIVANAGENDRA S/O VENKETESWARA RAO AGED 40 YRS, UNAGATIA CHAGALLU MANDAL EAST GOADARI DISTRI

6. THE PATHA PATTISAM P.A. C.S., REP BY CHAIR PERSON

N.RAMBABU S/O SATYANARAYANA AGED 44 YRS, PATHA

PATTISAM POLAVARAM MANDAL ELURU DISTRIC

7. THE MARKONDEPADU P.A.C.S., REP BY C.E.O. P.VARALAXMI

W/O DHARMA RAJU AGED 56 YRS, MARKONDEPADU CHAGALLU

MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

8. THE D.MUPPAVARAM P.A.C.S., REP BY CEO D.SATYANARANA

MURTHY S/O VEERA BHADRA SWAMIYAJULU AGED 62 YRS, DARAVARAM CHAGALLU MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

9. THE MADDURU P.A.C.S., REP BY C.E.O. PATTABHI RAMARAO

S/O RAMACHANDRA RAO AGED 59 YRS, MADDURU KOWURU

MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

10. THE PURUSHOTTAPALLI P.A.C.S., REP BY CEO D. SURYA

CHANDRA VARA PRASAD S/O APPARAO, AGED 61 YRS, PURUSHOTTAPALLI NIDADAVOLE MANDAL EAST GODAVARI

DISTRIC

11. THE PENDYALA P.A.C.S., REP BY C S REP CEO K.SRINIVASU S/O

LAXMI NARASIMHA AGED 57Y. MUNIPALLI NIDADAVOLE

MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRIC

12. THE KORUPALLI P.A.C.S, REP BY CEO A.SRIKANTH S/O DURGA

PRASAD AGED 40 YEARS THALLAPALEM NIDADAVOLE MANDAL

EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

13. THE SAMISRAGUDEM P.A.C.S., REP BY CEO K.MANJUSRI W/O

KESAVARAO AGED 45 YRS, SAMISRAGUDEM NIDADAVOLE

MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

14. THE THADIMALLA P.A.C.S, REP BY CEO K. ANANDARAJU S/O

SUBBARAO AGED 52Y. KATAKUTESWARAM NIDADAVOLE

MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRIC

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE

REGIONAL

MANAGER,

NATIONAL

AGRICULTURAL

INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., UNITED INDIA INSURANCE TOWERS

BASHEERBAGH, HYDERABAD

2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

COOP CENTRAL BANK ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA

PRADESH STATE

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in

the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in deducting the crop insurance premium from the crop loans of the petitioners/members released and to be released to the members of the petitioners at the rate of 1percentage to 12.5 percentage towards crop insurance premium in the khariff and rabbi seasons 2025 to 2026 is as illegal, arbitrary, violation of provisions of constitution of India, contract Act and declare the same as optional and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the Respondents not to deduct any crop insurance premium from the Loans released and to be released from the petitioners and Members of petitioners in Khariff and rabbi seasons 2025 to 2026, pending disposal of above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. B PARAMESEWARA RAO

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. SURAGANI VIJAYA KUMAR

2. P MOHAN RAO

WRIT PETITION NO: 23714 of 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous.

In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 05.11.2026 BSM/KSK

WRIT PETITION NO: 23714 of 2025 Date: 05.11.2026

BSM/KSK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead