Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/23714/2025 of THE KALAVALAPALLI PACS Vs THE REGIONAL MANAGER on 4 November 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 5th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23714/2025 Between: 1. THE KALAVALAPALLI PACS, REP.BY ITS CHAIR PERSON A.SITHARAMANJANEYULU S/O SATYANARAYANA AGED
APHC010448452025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 5th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 23714/2025
Between:
1. THE KALAVALAPALLI PACS, REP.BY ITS CHAIR PERSON
A.SITHARAMANJANEYULU S/O SATYANARAYANA AGED 61 YRS, KALAVALAPALLI CHAGALLU MANDAL E.G. DISTRICT
2. THE CHIKKALA P.A.C.S, REP BY ITS CHAIR PERSON Y.ABBULU
S/O RAJARAO AGED 63 YRS.CHIKKALA CHAGALLU MANDAL
E.G. DISTRICT
3. THE
KOTTAPATTISEEMA
P.A.C.S,
THE
KOTTAPATTISEEMA
P.A.C.S REP BY CHAIR PERSON SHAIK. NAZEER S/O KHASIM
AGED 51Y. DHAVILESWARAM RAJAHMUNDRY RURAL MANDAL
EAST GODAVARI DISTRIC
4. THE
GUTALA
P.A.C.S.,
REP
BY
CHAIR
PERSON
A.V.V.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY S/O NARASIMHA MURTHY.
AGED 58 YRS, GUTALA POLA VARAM MANDAL ELURU DISTRICT
5. THE
UNAGATIA
L.S.C.S.,
REP
BY
CHAIR
PERSON
B.SIVANAGENDRA S/O VENKETESWARA RAO AGED 40 YRS, UNAGATIA CHAGALLU MANDAL EAST GOADARI DISTRI
6. THE PATHA PATTISAM P.A. C.S., REP BY CHAIR PERSON
N.RAMBABU S/O SATYANARAYANA AGED 44 YRS, PATHA
PATTISAM POLAVARAM MANDAL ELURU DISTRIC
7. THE MARKONDEPADU P.A.C.S., REP BY C.E.O. P.VARALAXMI
W/O DHARMA RAJU AGED 56 YRS, MARKONDEPADU CHAGALLU
MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
8. THE D.MUPPAVARAM P.A.C.S., REP BY CEO D.SATYANARANA
MURTHY S/O VEERA BHADRA SWAMIYAJULU AGED 62 YRS, DARAVARAM CHAGALLU MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
9. THE MADDURU P.A.C.S., REP BY C.E.O. PATTABHI RAMARAO
S/O RAMACHANDRA RAO AGED 59 YRS, MADDURU KOWURU
MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
10. THE PURUSHOTTAPALLI P.A.C.S., REP BY CEO D. SURYA
CHANDRA VARA PRASAD S/O APPARAO, AGED 61 YRS, PURUSHOTTAPALLI NIDADAVOLE MANDAL EAST GODAVARI
DISTRIC
11. THE PENDYALA P.A.C.S., REP BY C S REP CEO K.SRINIVASU S/O
LAXMI NARASIMHA AGED 57Y. MUNIPALLI NIDADAVOLE
MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRIC
12. THE KORUPALLI P.A.C.S, REP BY CEO A.SRIKANTH S/O DURGA
PRASAD AGED 40 YEARS THALLAPALEM NIDADAVOLE MANDAL
EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
13. THE SAMISRAGUDEM P.A.C.S., REP BY CEO K.MANJUSRI W/O
KESAVARAO AGED 45 YRS, SAMISRAGUDEM NIDADAVOLE
MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
14. THE THADIMALLA P.A.C.S, REP BY CEO K. ANANDARAJU S/O
SUBBARAO AGED 52Y. KATAKUTESWARAM NIDADAVOLE
MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRIC
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE
REGIONAL
MANAGER,
NATIONAL
AGRICULTURAL
INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., UNITED INDIA INSURANCE TOWERS
BASHEERBAGH, HYDERABAD
2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
COOP CENTRAL BANK ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH STATE
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in
the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in deducting the crop insurance premium from the crop loans of the petitioners/members released and to be released to the members of the petitioners at the rate of 1percentage to 12.5 percentage towards crop insurance premium in the khariff and rabbi seasons 2025 to 2026 is as illegal, arbitrary, violation of provisions of constitution of India, contract Act and declare the same as optional and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the Respondents not to deduct any crop insurance premium from the Loans released and to be released from the petitioners and Members of petitioners in Khariff and rabbi seasons 2025 to 2026, pending disposal of above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. B PARAMESEWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SURAGANI VIJAYA KUMAR
2. P MOHAN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 23714 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 05.11.2026 BSM/KSK
WRIT PETITION NO: 23714 of 2025 Date: 05.11.2026
BSM/KSK