Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/708/2023 of ANANTHU KANTHAMMA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 1 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 708/2023 Between: 1. ANANTHU KANTHAMMA, W/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O 9-25, GOPALAPURAM, PAMURU VILLAGE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, AP. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH,

APHC010011942023

IN THE

MONDAY, T

THE HONOURAB

WR

Between:

1. ANANTHU KANTHAM

YEARS, R/O 9-25, GO

DISTRICT, AP.

1. THE STATE OF AN

(REVENUE),

THE

AMARAVATHI.

2. THE DISTRICT COLL

3. THE

MANDAL

RE

DISTRICT.

4. THE TAHSILDAR, PA

Petition under Article

circumstances stated in th

pleased topleased to issue

order or direction declarin

claiming to construct build

Kendram and other building

petitioner, namely, Ac. 0.18

Ac.0.20 cents in Sy.No.76/6

Sy.No.76/8, total Ac.1-00

W.P

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THE 2nd DAY OF NOVEMBER 2026

PRESENT

BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPA

IT PETITION NO: 708/2023

MMA, W/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED A

OPALAPURAM, PAMURU VILLAGE, PR

...PE

AND

DHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SEC

SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS,

VELA

ECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGO

EVENUE

OFFICER,

PAMURU,

PR

AMURU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

...RESPON

226 of the Constitution of India praying e affidavit filed therewith, the High Co Writ of Mandamus or any other appropr ng that the action of the Respondents dings for Rythu Bharosa Kendram, A

gs for their utilisation on the land belon 8 cents in Sy.No.76/4, Ac. 0.19 cents in S

6, Ac.0.28 cents in Sy.No.76/3 and Ac.0

0, situate in Pamuru village, Pamur

RC,J

P.No.708 of 2023

H

ATI

ABOUT 70

RAKASAM

TITIONER

CRETARY

AGAPUDI,

OLE.

RAKASAM

NDENT(S):

g that in the

urt may be

riate Writ or

s herein in

Amma Vodi

nging to the

Sy.No.76/5,

.15 cents in

ru Mandal,

RC,J

W.P.No.708 of 2023

Prakasam District, as arbitrary, illegal and as unjust and issue a consequential direction directing the Respondents herein not to interfere with the said land, with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in the said land, in any manner whatsoever, either for construction of any of the buildings for their utilisation, including Rythu Bharosa Kendram, Amma Vodi Kendram, etc., and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to issue interim directions directing the Respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's possession and enjoyment of her land, namely, Ac. 0.18

cents in Sy.No.76/4, Ac. 0.19 cents in Sy.No.76/5, Ac.0.20 cents in Sy.No.76/6, Ac.0.28 cents in Sy.No.76/3 and Ac.0.15 cents in Sy.No.76/8, total Ac.1-00, situate in Pamuru village, Pamuru Mandal, Prakasam District, pending disposal of above Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the status quo order dated 06.01.2023 in W.P.No.708 of 2023 and also prayed the Hon'ble Court to dismiss the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.S N CHIDAMBARA SASTRY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following:

RC,J

W.P.No.708 of 2023

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Sri S.N.Chidambara Sastry, learned counsel for petitioner, addressed a letter dated 01.10.2026 to the Registry seeking permission of the Court to withdraw enclosing the letter addressed to the learned counsel by the writ petitioner dated 15.09.2026, stating that the writ petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition.

2. Perused the letters.

3. Permission as sought is accorded.

4. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 2ND November, 2026

RR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead