Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/1322/2019 of Deepak Kumar Rout Vs RASHTIRYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD on 1 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF NOVEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 1322/2019 Between: 1. DEEPAK KUMAR ROUT, S/O NAKULA ROUT, AGED 24 YEARS, R/O AT- RAMPUR POST,
APHC010028202019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF NOVEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 1322/2019
Between:
1. DEEPAK KUMAR ROUT, S/O NAKULA ROUT, AGED 24 YEARS, R/O
AT- RAMPUR POST, BALARAMPUR, TALAGARH, VIZ- JENAPUR, DISTRICT- JAJPUR ODISHA STATE
...PETITIONER
AND
1. RASHTIRYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD, VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR VISAKHAPATNAM.
2. RASHTRIYA
ISPAT
NIGAM
LTD,
HUMAN
RESOURCE
DEPARTMENT, REP., BY ITS HR RECRUITMENT SECTION
VISAKHAPATNAM
3. RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD, MEDICAL BOARD, REP BY CHIEF
MEDICAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in not giving the date of re- medical checkup inspite of several representations and to set aside the proceedings dated. 14.02.2018 by 2nd respondent declaring me medical unfit and cancelling my selection for post of management trainee (TECH) , as arbitrary, illegal, null and void and against norms of public policy and principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities
VS,J
W.P.No.1322 of 2019
to consider the case of the petitioner basing on the certificate issued by the Rourkela government hospital for appointment of the petitioner for the post of management trainee (TECH)
IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondent authorities to re-conduct the medical examination to the petitioner, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. T S RAYALU
The Court made the following:
VS,J
W.P.No.1322 of 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Today, when the matter came up for hearing, Mr.G.Venkat Sailendra, learned counsel representing Mr.Venkateswara Rao Gudapati, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that no further cause survives in this matter and that the matter has become infructuous.
2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
Date: 02.11.2026 KGR