Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/23533/2020 of Y. Jagadeesh Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 1 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 23533 of 2020 along with WP.No.24928 of 2020 Bench Sr.No:- 24 & 25 [3584] 1. WP.No.23533 of 2020: Y. Jagadeesh ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...Respondents 2. W.P.No.24928 of of 2020: Y. Jagadeesh

APHC010354152020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 23533 of 2020 along with WP.No.24928 of 2020

Bench Sr.No:-

24 & 25

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. WP.No.23533 of 2020: Y. Jagadeesh ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...Respondents

2. W.P.No.24928 of of 2020: Y. Jagadeesh ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...Respondents ********** CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 2nd November, 2026 Present : Advocate for Petitioner : NONE Advocates for Respondents : GP for Medical, Health & FW, Ms Tata Venkata Sridevi, SC for Dr.NTR University of Health Sciences, Mr G Sai Narayana Rao, SC for SAAP

LISA GILL, CJ:

W.P.No.23533 of 2020 has been filed by petitioner for verification and authentication of his sports certificates by appropriate authorities and consideration of his eligibility for admission into MBBS/BDS courses under Sports Quota for the academic year 2020–21 and vide W.P.No.24928 of 2020

HCJ & CGR, J WP_23533 & 24928_2020

petitioner challenges rejection of his sports credentials and also seeks an enquiry into alleged irregularities in preparation of Sports Quota merit list.

2. Learned counsel for respondents submit that petitioner did not get admission in MBBS/BDS course for the academic year 2020-21, therefore, present writ petitions are rendered infructuous.

3. There is no representation on behalf of petitioner today, however, we do not find any justification for continuation of proceedings on this count.

4. Keeping in view the specific statement made by learned counsel for respondents, these Writ Petitions are disposed of as infructuous. Liberty is however afforded to petitioner to file appropriate application in case of any subsisting grievance, within a period of four weeks. No costs. Pending application(s) if any stand(s) disposed of accordingly.

5. Copy of this order be conveyed to petitioner on given address. Photocopy of this order be placed on the file of aforementioned connected case.

LISA GILL, CJ

Date:02.11.2026 CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J

Vjl Whether the order is Speaking/Reasoned : Yes / No Whether the order is Reportable

: Yes / No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead