Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/31665/2026 of M/s Bharathi Wines Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 1 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF NOVEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 31665/2026 Between: 1. M/S BHARATHI WINES, SHOP ROOM IN S.Y.NO.165/2A1,MAHARAJAPURAM VILLAGE,VIJAYAPURAM

APHC010578032026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF NOVEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 31665/2026

Between:

1. M/S

BHARATHI

WINES,

SHOP

ROOM

IN

S.Y.NO.165/2A1,MAHARAJAPURAM

VILLAGE,VIJAYAPURAM

MANDALAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT REP BY ITS LICENSEE

SMT BHARATHI PRABHAKARAN WIO PRABHAKARAN,AGE 57

YEARS,

RIO

D.NO.20/FLAT

NO.F

2,NATHAMUNI

STREET,SHENOY NAGAR,CHENNAI.PIN- 600030.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT

SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT,A.P 522238.

2. THE

COMMISSIONER

OF

PROHIBITION

AND

EXCISE,

GOVERNMENT

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

MANGALGIRI,GUNTURU.ANDHRA PRADESH.PIN 522503.

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITHOOR,ANDHRA PRADESH.

4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE, CHITHOOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. .

5. THE

DISTRICT

PROHIBITION

AND

EXCISE

OFFICER,

CHITHOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH.PIN -517001.

6. SRI PADMANABHA RAJU, LICENSEE/PROPRIETOR OF M/S.

SRIDEVI WINES,GANDLAKANDRIGA VILLAGE,VIJAPURAM

MANDALAM,CHITOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.PIN

517507

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the competent respondents to consider and dispose of my representations dated 27.10.2026 by a reasoned order, after examining the applicable statutory provisions, licensing conditions, proposed location and allegations concerning the operation of M/s. Sridevi Wines, before granting permission for the proposed relocation and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 to stay of all further proceedings in respect of proposed relocation of M/s. Sridevi Wines to a location adjacent to M/s. Bharathi Wines, G.SL. No. CTR/60, situated at Maharajapuram Village, Vijayapuram Mandal, Chittoor District till the disposal of main writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. VENKATESH KOSARAJU

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE

2. GP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner’s representation dated 27.10.2026, the present writ petition is filed.

2. No representation for the petitioner. Heard Sri Nagaraju Pullagura, learned Government Pleader for Prohibition & Excise for the respondents.

3. The relief sought in the writ petition is innocuous wherein a direction is sought to consider the representation dated 27.10.2026 made by the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Pleader for Prohibition & Excise submitted that the authorities have an intention to pass orders on the representation and prayed to dispose of the writ petition.

5. A perusal of the record would indicate that the petitioner made representations dated 20.10.2026 & 27.10.2026. Learned Government Pleader for Prohibtiion & Excise admitted that the said representations so made by the petitioner are received and they have an intention to pass orders on the same.

6. Taking the submissions of the learned Government Pleader into consideration, as the respondents have an intention to pass orders on the petitioners representations, instead of going into the merits and demerits of the matter, this Court is inclined to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents concerned to pass orders on the petitioner’s representations dated 20.10.2026 & 27.10.2026 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________

JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

Date: 02nd November, 2026

RKS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead