Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/22886/2023 of P ESWAR REDDY Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 1 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22886/2023 Between: 1. P ESWAR REDDY, S/O LANKI REDDY ,68 YEARS AGRICUTURIST R/O 6-6-165/3 SIVARAMA KRISHNA NAGAR, BADVEL. TOWN AND MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. P.RAMA

APHC010440532023

IN THE

MONDAY, T

THE HONOURAB

WRIT

Between:

1. P ESWAR REDDY, S

R/O 6-6-165/3 SIVAR

MANDAL, YSR KADA

2. P.RAMA

DEVI,,

W

AGRICUTURIST

R/O

BADVEL TOWN 86 M

1. THE STATE OF AN

SECRETARY,

REV

VELAGAPUDI, GUNT

2. THE DISTRICT COLL

3. REVENUE DIVISIONA

4. THE TAHSILDAR, B.M

5. KONDA YELLAMMA,

6. ONDA SANJEEVAMM

T.RAMAPURAM, B.MA

Petition under Article

circumstances stated in th

W.P.N

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THE 2nd DAY OF NOVEMBER 2026

PRESENT

BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPA

T PETITION NO: 22886/2023

S/O LANKI REDDY ,68 YEARS AGRIC

RAMA KRISHNA NAGAR, BADVEL. TO

APA DISTRICT.

W/O

SIVA

SANKAR

REDDY

O

6-6-329,

SIVARAMA

KRISHNA

ANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

...PETIT

AND

NDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS P

VENUE

DEPARTMENT,

SECR

TUR.

ECTOR, KADAPA.YSR. KADAPA DIST

AL OFFICER, BADVEL, YSR KADAPA D

MA TAM, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

W/O KONDA CHINNA OBAIAH,

MA, .KW/O KONDA OBAIAH. R-5AND 6

ATAM, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT

...RESPON

226 of the Constitution of India praying e affidavit filed therewith, the High Co RC,J

NO.22886 of 2023

H

ATI

CUTURIST

OWN AND

YEARS

NAGAR,

TIONER(S)

PRINCIPAL

RETARIAT,

TRICT.

DISTRICT.

6 ARE R/O

NDENT(S):

g that in the

urt may be

RC,J

W.P.NO.22886 of 2023

pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents particularly respondent No.2 to 4 in taking action in pursuance of the representation of the petitioners issued by way of legal notice dt.12-05-2023 in cancelling the alleged DKT patta granted in favour of Respondent No.5 and 6

in respect of Ac.0.92 cents each in Sy.No.844/4 and 844/5 of Rekulakunta village in B.Mattam mandal, YSR Kadapa district respectively though there is no land in the survey number beyond the land granted to the petitioners by way of DKT pattas on 12-01-2001 and 14 cents in Sy.No.844/2 which is rasta as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, high handed, and dilatory and consequently direct the respondent No2to4 to cancel the alleged DKT patta granted in favour of Respondent No.5 and 6 in respect of Ac.0.92 cents each Sy.No.844/4 and 844/5 of Rekulakunta village in B.Mattam mandal, YSR Kadapa district by considering and disposing of the representation of the petitioners issued by way of legal notice 12-05-2023 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to 4 to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioners issued by way of legal notice dtl 2-05-2023

pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1.L J VEERA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR REVENUE

2.M DELHI BABU

RC,J

W.P.NO.22886 of 2023

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Sri L.J.Veera Reddy, learned counsel for petitioner, addressed a letter dated 26.10.2026 to the Registry seeking permission of the Court to withdraw enclosing the letter addressed to the learned counsel by the writ petitioner dated 23.10.2026, stating that the writ petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition.

2. Perused the letters.

3. Permission as sought is accorded.

4. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 2ND November, 2026

RR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead