Bombay High Court
WP/1038/2024 of MOBIN @ SAJJU S/O MUKHTAR MALIK AND ANOTHER Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS on 4 November 2026
WRIT PETITION NO. 1038 OF 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 915 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1038 OF 2024 Mobin @ Sajju S/o Mukhtar Malik And Another Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ • Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 915 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1038 OF 2024 Mobin @ Sajju S/o Mukhtar Malik And Another Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ • Mr. Shaikh Joyeb I., Advocate for the Petitioners (Through V.C.) • Ms. U. S. Bhosale, APP for State __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 04, 2026 P E R C O U R T :
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Petitioner No. 1 is ready for going before the concerned police officer for recording his statement. However, the grievance is that the concerned police officer is trying to compromise the matter.
However, the learned APP has placed on record the communication dated 21.10.2024, mentioning that the statements of other petitioners are recorded, but only Petitioner No. 1 is not cooperating with the investigating agency. She further submits that despite being called upon Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:55097-DB
915 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1038 OF 2024 from time to time, Petitioner No. 1 has not appeared before the Investigating Officer till date.
When asked about this, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Petitioner No. 1 will appear before the concerned Investigating Officer tomorrow itself, i.e., 05.11.2026, at 11:00 a.m.
Learned APP, on instructions, submits that if the Petitioner No. 1 remains present tomorrow, his statement will be recorded under Section 164 of Code of Criminal Procedure by taking appropriate time from the concerned Magistrate.
In view of the same, the criminal writ petition stands disposed of, provided that the concerned Investigating Officer shall proceed diligently with the investigation. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble
Page| 2 of 2