Bombay High Court
BA/2220/2026 of BHUSHAN RAVINDRA PATIL Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER on 3 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2220 OF 2026 Bhushan Ravindra Patil Versus The State of Maharashtra and Another ….. Mr. Rahul R. Karpe, Advocate for Applicant Mr. V. K. Kotecha, APP for the Respondent-State ..... CORAM : HITEN
-1-
NOB-1-BA-2220-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2220 OF 2026
Bhushan Ravindra Patil
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Another
…..
Mr. Rahul R. Karpe, Advocate for Applicant Mr. V. K. Kotecha, APP for the Respondent-State
.....
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
DATED : 3rd NOVEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.
2. Learned Advocate appearing for applicant submits that, during pendency of present application, charge-sheet has been filed, and therefore, he has instructions to withdraw the present application with liberty to file a fresh application before the learned Trial Court.
3. Permission to withdraw is granted with liberty to file a fresh application before the learned Trial Court along with copy of charge-sheet.
4. In case the application is preferred alongwith the charge-sheet then the learned Trial Court shall decide the same in accordance with law.
5. Bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR) JUDGE Tandale 2026:BHC-AUG:55069