Bombay High Court

WP/15872/2026 of GOVIND SHANKARRAO METHE AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS on 3 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 15872 OF 2026 GOVIND SHANKARRAO METHE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Pawar Vaibhav U. AGP for Respondents: Ms. S.S. Joshi

1 942.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 15872 OF 2026

GOVIND SHANKARRAO METHE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH

ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Pawar Vaibhav U.

AGP for Respondents: Ms. S.S. Joshi

...

CORAM

: NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND

ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE

: 03.11.2026

PER COURT:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Leave is granted to correct the dates mentioned in the chart given in paragraph No.3 of the petition.

2. Indisputably, the issue raised in this Petition is squarely covered by the orders dated 3rd July, 2026 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Circuit Bench at Kolhapur in Writ Petition No. 5445 of 2026 and dated 19th June, 2026 in Writ Petition No. 3412 of 2026.

3. Reliance is also placed on order dated 18th March, 2026 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Bombay in Writ Petition No. 15662 of 2025. 2026:BHC-AUG:54506-DB

2 942.odt

4. For the reasons stated in the above mentioned orders, the Writ Petition is partly allowed with following directions:

a. The Petitioners would be entitled for monetary benefits / difference of pensionary benefits as per the actuals w.e.f. their respective dates of superannuation, provided they have worked for 6 months or more in the last year up to their superannuation.

b. The pensionary benefits of the Petitioners would be recalculated by including the annual increment in their last drawn salary prior to their superannuation and such recalculated pensionary benefits shall be payable to them.

c. Arrears if any, shall be paid to them within a period of 90 days. Many of the Petitioners have approached belatedly before this Court and, therefore, akin to the orders passed in several matters, they would not be entitled for the interest component. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) habeeb/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead