Bombay High Court
APPLN/3971/2026 of PRAVIN DAGDUBA SHAHANE Vs SANTOSH PUNDLIK BUNDHE AND OTHERS on 2 November 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 53 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 739 OF 2026 PRAVIN DAGDUBA SHAHANE VERSUS SANTOSH PUNDLIK BUNDHE AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.A.P.Sonpethkar APP for respondent-State : Mr.A.S.Shinde … WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3971 OF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 53 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 739 OF 2026 PRAVIN DAGDUBA SHAHANE VERSUS SANTOSH PUNDLIK BUNDHE AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.A.P.Sonpethkar APP for respondent-State : Mr.A.S.Shinde … WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3971 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO.739/2026 …
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 02.11.2026 P.C. :
Heard.
The learned APP, on instructions, submits that respondent no.1 accused in connection with Crime No.314 of 2025 of Jinsi Police Station, Chh. Sambhajinagar is already arrested and the investigation is also completed and the charge sheet is sent for approval. 2026:BHC-AUG:54204-DB
However, the learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued that the amendment application is also filed by the petitioner along with this petition for adding additional grounds in the original Criminal Writ Petition. According to him, only after filing application under Section 156 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code before the concerned Magistrate, the crime has been registered against the respondent no.1. Moreover, he was arrested only after direction of this Court. However, at present, the allegation against the respondent no.1 is that he has cheated so many persons like the petitioner, and therefore, direction for investigation of crime needs to be passed.
However, since purpose of this petition is subserved, we are not inclined to enlarge the scope of this petition by granting amendment at this juncture.
However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file appropriate petition separately for the said relief, if required.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition along with pending Criminal Application stand disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC